Search for: "United States v. Auto Workers" Results 21 - 40 of 195
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Sep 2018, 3:59 am by Jorge Miranda
What it is likely to do instead is to establish a floor to the auto content originating in the United States and Canada (assuming Canada does join NAFTA 2.0), because it is only in the United States and Canada that North American industrial workers making parts and materials for automobiles earn at least US$ 16 dollars per hour. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 4:36 am by Edith Roberts
Lundgren, in which the justices considered tribal immunity from state-court actions to adjudicate title to land, and United States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 3:53 am by Brennan W. Bolt
Aug. 23, 2012), upholding the National Labor Relations Board's decision in Dana Corporation, 356 NLRB No. 49 (2010), finding that a pre-recognition framework agreement between Dana Corporation and the United Auto Workers did not violate the National Labor Relations Act. [read post]
17 May 2013, 7:36 am by Greg Mersol
  But since then, in 2011 the United States Supreme Court decided Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 6:00 am by Beth Graham
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit next stated only an arbitrator has the authority to decide the issue of arbitrability before reversing the district court’s decision and remanding the case with instructions to compel arbitration. [read post]
29 May 2014, 9:42 am
The Supreme Court of the United Kingdom issued a ruling on the status of equity partners in law firms that flies in the face a recent ruling by the Supreme Court of Canada.On May 22, the SCC ruled in McCormick v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 9:40 am by Frank O'Donnell, Clean Air Watch
INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE & AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA – UAW BOB KING, President DENNIS WILLIAMS, Secretary-Treasurer VICE PRESIDENTS: JOE ASHTON • CINDY ESTRADA • GENERAL HOLIEFIELD • JIMMY SETTLES IN REPLY REFER TO April 4, 2011 1757 N STREET, N.W. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Supreme Court [of the United States] subsequently rejected such inferences as incompatible with ordinary contract principles under federal law in M and G Polymers USA, LLC v Tackett (574 US 427 [2015]) and CNH Industrial N.V. v Reese (583 US 138 S Ct 761 [2018]), repudiating International Union, United Auto., Aerospace, and Agric. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Supreme Court [of the United States] subsequently rejected such inferences as incompatible with ordinary contract principles under federal law in M and G Polymers USA, LLC v Tackett (574 US 427 [2015]) and CNH Industrial N.V. v Reese (583 US 138 S Ct 761 [2018]), repudiating International Union, United Auto., Aerospace, and Agric. [read post]
14 May 2014, 9:27 am by Gene Killian
Let’s review an Illinois case from a few years back, United Stationers Supply Co v. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 10:43 am by Rich McHugh
However, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit later reversed the lower court’s decision based on that appeal court’s previous decision in International Union, United Auto, Aerospace, & Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. [read post]