Search for: "United States v. Baca"
Results 21 - 40
of 42
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jan 2020, 9:07 am
New Relists Patterson v. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 3:52 am
United States, which stems from the federal government’s failure to fully reimburse health insurance companies for losses created as a result of the Affordable Care Act. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 9:01 pm
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit recently issued a decision (in Baca v. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 9:37 pm
It includes an analysis of the "Census Question" case: Department of Commerce v. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 6:17 am
Here is the order in De Baca v. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 9:34 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 1:37 pm
United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
Comment k could correspond to Led Zeppelin, and state of the art might be The Who.And it seems that, for each of these bands, there’s a song we really like that gets slighted (in our opinion) when it comes to air time on classic rock stations. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 4:09 am
United States (2012) 133 S.Ct. 511, in which the Supreme Court rejected an argument that temporarily flooding someone's property cannot qualify as a taking, as a matter of law. [read post]
4 Aug 2012, 2:54 pm
Baca, 400 F.3d 1152 (9th Cir. 2005), and United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 5:15 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 10:49 am
" In 1963, the United States Supreme Court held in the landmark case of Brady v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 10:57 am
Brief of the United StatesReply of petitioner In association with Bloomberg Law [read post]
28 Jan 2012, 9:10 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 9:03 pm
United States v. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 11:50 am
" The claim that the 7 ½-foot tall high-power microwave device — dubbed the "Pain Ray" by the media — will cause no injury is highly dubious, to say the least: There is good evidence from the United States military that it is capable of inflicting not only intolerable pain, but death. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 7:59 pm
Brown and David Matusow, Bahr, et al. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 4:36 pm
United States Issue: Whether the Fourth Amendment requires that the decision to impound a vehicle for community caretaking purposes without a warrant be made in accordance with standardized police procedures. [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 10:27 pm
United States, 395 U.S. 6 (1969). [read post]
22 Aug 2007, 11:50 am
Baca, 2000 WL 1909474 at *7 (C.D. [read post]
