Search for: "United States v. Baca" Results 21 - 40 of 49
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Mar 2020, 3:43 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Stitt and the State of Oklahoma (Indian Gaming Regulatory Act)United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 11:04 am by Unknown
Stitt and the State of Oklahoma (Indian Gaming Regulatory Act)United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 4:23 am by DONALD SCARINCI
The United States Supreme Court will hear Chiafalo v. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 9:07 am by John Elwood
New Relists Patterson v. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 3:52 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which stems from the federal government’s failure to fully reimburse health insurance companies for losses created as a result of the Affordable Care Act. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 7:20 am by David Post
Last week, the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals weighed in on this "faithless elector" question in its opinion in Baca v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 8:01 am
Rule 16(a)(6) is a catchall clause that requires the government to “[a]dvise the defendant’s attorney of evidence favorable to the defendant and material to the defendant’s guilt or punishment to which defendant is entitled pursuant to Brady and United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
  Comment k could correspond to Led Zeppelin, and state of the art might be The Who.And it seems that, for each of these bands, there’s a song we really like that gets slighted (in our opinion) when it comes to air time on classic rock stations. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 4:09 am by Rick E. Rayl
United States (2012) 133 S.Ct. 511, in which the Supreme Court rejected an argument that temporarily flooding someone's property cannot qualify as a taking, as a matter of law. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 10:57 am by Matthew Bush
Brief of the United StatesReply of petitioner In association with Bloomberg Law [read post]