Search for: "United States v. Bailey" Results 181 - 200 of 291
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2016, 1:30 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
ZM v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Northern Ireland); HA (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12–14 January 2016. [read post]
30 May 2012, 8:21 am by Guest Blogger
Additionally, both the States and the private plaintiffs in the Supreme Court relied on the 1922 decision in Bailey v. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 6:46 am
  As Wikipedia explains, bankruptcy in the United Statesis a matter placed under federal jurisdiction by the United States Constitution (in Article 1,Section 8, Clause 4), which allows Congress to enact `uniform laws on the subject of bankruptcies throughout the United States’. [read post]
14 May 2013, 7:19 am by Cormac Early
United States, a challenge to the constitutionality of court-martial jurisdiction over a civilian contractor. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 5:05 am by SHG
The United States Supreme Court stuck defendants in the middle of a mine field, and the California Supreme Court decided that the defendant deserved to be destroyed even if he never actually stepped on a mine. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 8:20 am by Alfred Brophy
Klarman, The Framers’ Coup: The Making of the United States Constitution, reviewed by Melvin Yazawa, 585–586. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 6:04 am by Viking
" KIVITV reports that: United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 6:20 am by Eugene Volokh
On the night of May 2-3, 2009, Terrion Key and Charles Bailey hosted a party for a group of about a dozen friends at their apartment in College Park. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 6:24 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The New York Times on November 18, 2011 released the following: "PREET BHARARA, the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, JANICE K. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 3:26 pm by David Ettinger
On May 1, 2, and 3, the court will hear the following cases (with the issues presented as stated on the court’s website): United Teachers of Los Angeles v. [read post]