Search for: "United States v. Ball" Results 201 - 220 of 897
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Sep 2012, 11:07 am by William McGinley
  The statute is anything but clear, especially when viewed in the light of the Supreme Court’s decisions in Citizens United v. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 3:14 am by Amy Howe
United States, in which the Court is considering whether a Pennsylvania man can be held criminally liable for threatening statements he made on Facebook, dominated Court-related coverage and commentary. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 6:18 am by Adam Chandler
Yesterday Senate Democrats were unable to break a Republican filibuster on the DISCLOSE Act, a legislative response to the Court’s recent decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 1:14 pm by Peter Margulies
United States consular officials process millions of visa applications annually (see the State Department’s latest statistics here). [read post]
11 Mar 2007, 4:09 pm
Moreover, Baden alleged that Molten imports its balls into the United States without marking the country of origin, constituting a misrepresentation of geographic origin. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 5:29 pm by INFORRM
Secondly, there is a point concerning the position in the United States. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 3:57 pm
With the "Click Through" Nexus debate rounding third, Illinois threw the state and local tax ("SALT") community a curve ball with its ruling in Performance Marketing Association v. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 12:03 pm
  Presumably the power exists partly to balance out the power of prosecutors gone wild, especially when they have gone wild on officers trying to carry out the foreign policy of the United States, albeit by way of cooking up a stupid story (apparently). [read post]
7 Apr 2007, 11:01 am
("We're taking our ball and going home. [read post]
31 May 2007, 1:15 pm
For comparison's sake, the United States Supreme Court held in Simmons that a defendant's incriminating statements in support of a motion to suppress on Fourth Amendment grounds (e.g., an admission that he owned the suitcase in which the drugs were found) weren't admissible at trial, holding that it's "intolerable that one constitutional right should have to be surrendered in order to assert another. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 10:51 am
Presumably what's good for the United States is good for everyone else too. [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 11:58 pm
BNA's United States Law Week reported in Vol. 75, No. 33 (Mar. 6, 2007) on the case In re Cardizem CD Antitrust Litigation, --- F.3d ----, 2007 WL 528044 (6th Cir. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 2:51 am by Scott Bomboy
On November 9, 1953, the United States Supreme Court upheld a prior, controversial decision that allowed major league baseball to operate outside of the Sherman Antitrust Act. [read post]