Search for: "United States v. Ball" Results 81 - 100 of 887
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2008, 3:16 pm
Marty asks whether this provision violates the principles of United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 10:36 am by Kent Scheidegger
"  So said the United States Supreme Court today in Sexton v. [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 7:32 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
The word mark “WINNING ISN’T NORMAL” has also been registered with the United States Patent and Trademark Office with Registration No. 4630749 for printed matter. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 1:02 pm
DollOn Monday, July 6, 2009, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (minus Judge LouPLI Publishes 2009 Federal Circuit YearbookEach year, the Federal Circuit Yearbook provides a concise, comprehensive review of every patent dec Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 5:03 am by Timothy P. Flynn
While Lockridge's appeals were pending, an interesting thing happened: the SCOTUS decided Alleyne v United States which held that a judgment of sentence could not be based on a fact that: a) defendant did not admit or, b) was determined to exist beyond a reasonable doubt by a jury.In last week's opinion, the Supreme Court, addressing defendant's Alleyne challenge to his sentence, held that Michigan's mandatory sentencing guidelines were unconstitutional… [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 12:10 pm by ricelawmd_3p2zve
Contributory negligence was also adopted in the United States to protect big business interests from worker claims in the days before workers’ compensation existed. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
” Justice Edward White Justice White gave as his rationale a citation from a previous case [United States v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
” Justice Edward White Justice White gave as his rationale a citation from a previous case [United States v. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 6:37 am by Daniel Schwartz
UPS, I predict the court will punt on the issue of the extent of the Pregnancy Discrimination Act, deferring to the United States’ brief recommending the same thing. [read post]