Search for: "United States v. Bank of the United States" Results 161 - 180 of 7,360
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2014, 8:45 am by Jaclyn Belczyk
United States [SCOTUSblog backgrounder] that prosecution under the federal government's anti-bank fraud statute [text] does not require proof that a defendant intended to defraud a financial institution. [read post]
20 May 2011, 9:39 am by PaulKostro
MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC.; Bank of America Corporation; United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit; No. 09–4676; May 18, 2011 : “[A] defendant can contractually waive his right to remove an action brought in a state court. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 5:21 am by Theresa Donovan
United States [SCOTUSblog backgrounder], which raises the issue of whether prosecution under the federal government's anti-bank fraud statute [text] requires proof that the defendant intended to defraud the financial institution and expose it to risk of loss. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 3:56 pm by Carlo Van den Bosch
Sheppard Mullin’s intellectual property group prevailed before the United States Supreme Court in the trademark matter entitled Hana Financial v. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 11:07 am by Matthew Kahn
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit disagreed, concluding that it was bound by its 2010 decision in United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 12:56 am by Jasmine Joseph
An aspect where both the majority and minority opinions in Citizens United v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 7:52 am by Allison Zieve
In a recent Rolling Stone article entitled “The Scam Wall Street Learned From the Mafia: How America's biggest banks took part in a nationwide bid-rigging conspiracy - until they were caught on tape,” by consumer reporter Matt Taibbi writes about a financial corruption trial against three bank executives in the case United States v. [read post]