Search for: "United States v. Barber" Results 61 - 80 of 139
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2015, 4:34 pm by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Defendant points to the fact United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) performed a study five years ago that found none of the cosmetics products they tested contained any evidence of asbestos. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 12:42 am by INFORRM
It is reported that 90% of voters in the United States support the right to delete links to personal information. [read post]
17 Jan 2015, 9:55 am by Larry Joseph
Virginia decision arose from a criminal action appealed from a state supreme court, and the 2013 United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 4:17 am by SHG
Indeed, we have previously recognized that administrative searches are not rendered invalid because they are accompanied by some degree of suspicion, see Bruce, 498 F.3d at 1242, and the Supreme Court has similarly noted that suspicion of criminal activity will not defeat an otherwise permissible administrative search, see United States v. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 1:43 pm
– 5:05 P.M.SESSION V (with coffee break 3:30-3:50)NYS CLE Credit: 2.0, Areas of Professional PracticeCommentators on proposals presented, and Q&A PeriodJane Ginsburg, ModeratorMorton L. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 6:44 am by Joy Waltemath
The employees contend that the Seventh Circuit’s decision conflicted with the First Circuit’s holding in Tum v Barber Foods, Inc and, more importantly, with the High Court’s decision in IBP, Inc v Alvarez. [read post]
17 May 2013, 9:25 am by Steven Eversole
Namely, bingo games and operations have been granted legitimacy throughout the state - provided they meet a strict criteria of of six guidelines, per the 2009 Alabama Supreme Court decision in Barber v. [read post]
16 May 2013, 5:00 pm
Namely, bingo games and operations have been granted legitimacy throughout the state – provided they meet a strict criteria of of six guidelines, per the 2009 Alabama Supreme Court decision in Barber v. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 7:14 pm by Linda McClain
Without embracing the equation made in Reynolds v. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 4:43 am by Susan Brenner
’ However, the Dictionary Act, 1 U.S Code § 1, which defines terms used in the United States Code `unless the context indicates otherwise,’ specifies that the word `person’ includes `corporations, companies, associations, firms, partnerships, societies, and joint stock companies, as well as individuals. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 1:55 pm by Mark Graber
Such pre-New Deal decisions as United States v. [read post]