Search for: "United States v. Barber" Results 101 - 120 of 139
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2013, 7:14 pm by Linda McClain
Without embracing the equation made in Reynolds v. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
It noted, quoting Justice Byron White’s concurring opinion in Furman v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 6:49 am by James Bickford
United States and Barber v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 12:36 pm by Jennifer Lynch
This is the first time an appellate court in the United States has reviewed a geofence warrant. [read post]
29 Aug 2010, 2:46 pm by Jeralyn
On June 7, my federal public defender office had the disturbing experience of losing Barber v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 4:37 am by SHG
[v] The Manual would serve as an excellent policy model for state prosecutors to adopt. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 1:40 am by Melina Padron
Jean PEARSON v the United Kingdom – 40957/07 [2011] ECHR 2319 (13 December 2011) January 4, 2012 European Court of Human Rights: State investigation into death of drug abuser with history of mental health problems was sufficient to satisfy Article 2 ECHR. [read post]
25 Nov 2018, 4:29 pm by INFORRM
United States The internet cases blog has covered the case of Benson v. [read post]
3 May 2011, 1:35 am by Melina Padron
  Iorworth HOARE v the United Kingdom – 16261/08 [2011] ECHR 722 (12 April 2011)  Convicted sex offender and lottery winner loses Euro human rights appeal against post limitation date. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 9:55 am by Gene Takagi
Borello & Sons, Inc. v Dept. of Industrial Relations (1989) 48 Cal.3d 341. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 11:23 pm
Georgia judgment and the Ilascu and others v. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 4:00 am by Alisa Lazear
Le (§2.4.4) addressing police racial profiling, trespass, and false imprisonment; the opinion dissenting from the Supreme Court of the United States’ denial of certiorari in Baxter v. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
 Indeed, sometimes it seems that they view constitutionalism not just as a normative benchmark, but as the exclusivenormative standard in relation to a state’s institutional setup: for the authors, asking whether something “must be permitted” is the same question as asking whether “constitutionalism requires that they be permitted” (10). [read post]