Search for: "United States v. Barker"
Results 81 - 100
of 175
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Nov 2023, 1:12 pm
The justices have agreed to decide the following issue: “Whether district courts, in determining whether the due process clause requires a state or local government to provide a post-seizure probable-cause hearing prior to a statutory judicial-forfeiture proceeding and, if so, when such a hearing must take place, should apply the “speedy trial” test employed in United States v. $8,850 and Barker v. [read post]
21 Aug 2010, 6:55 am
"The delay of which he complains, although not as long as in some other cases, see Doggett, 505 U.S. at 648 (eight and one half year delay); United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2009, 2:01 am
Also from the VC, see Supreme Court to Hear Potentially Important Property Rights Case, about SCOTUS agreeing to review the following question: In determining whether the Due Process Clause requires a State or local government to provide a post-seizure probable cause hearing prior to a statutory judicial forfeiture proceeding and, if so, when such a hearing must take place, should district courts apply the "speedy trial" test employed in United States… [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 6:57 am
Under prior law, if the fraud involved conduct in the United States or had an effect in the United States, victims had a private right to bring suit. [read post]
25 Feb 2021, 2:38 pm
Given the open-textured nature of the relevant constitutional text, "the question of congressional power under the Commerce Clause 'is necessarily one of degree.'" United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2021, 10:32 am
In cases like United States v. [read post]
16 Nov 2006, 10:07 pm
Jesse V. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 4:52 am
The Appellate Division, citing a number of cases including Matter of Board of Educ. of Barker Cent. [read post]
7 Apr 2007, 6:04 am
Acad. of Psychiatry and Law 13 (1992) 2. ^ United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 5:45 am
There is a long history of this association in the Commonwealth and the United States. [read post]
14 May 2014, 6:45 am
See Barker, 407 U.S. at 531; Cantu v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 4:03 pm
United States, saying, “In particular, ‘the right to criticize public men’ is ‘[o]ne of the prerogatives of American citizenship. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 10:33 am
Soto and United States v. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 8:35 am
State v. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 3:03 am
Legal research » United States. [read post]
6 May 2013, 7:44 am
Thus, the state of Maryland did not offend the United States Constitution when it denied counsel to Mr. [read post]
5 Dec 2020, 7:52 am
United States, a case involving the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. [read post]
29 Mar 2008, 3:07 pm
Barker, Warner v. [read post]
16 May 2008, 2:22 pm
Sentencing Commission, 2007 Sourcebook of Federal Sentencing Statistics Tables Sentencing Memorandum in United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 4:58 pm
” This event will consider the implications of the recent Comcast v. [read post]
