Search for: "United States v. Barnett" Results 41 - 60 of 461
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2012, 6:19 am by Joshua Matz
Ilya Shapiro and Carl DeNigris of CATO@Liberty contend that in this week’s decision in United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2016, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
United States” [Andrew Hamm, SCOTUSBlog on Paul Kens vs. [read post]
20 May 2019, 7:44 am by Brian Wolfman
The Supremacy Clause grants “supreme” status only to the “the Laws of the United States. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 9:57 am
The Supreme Court of the United States Blog today presents an enlightening analysis of Monday's decision in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 6:48 am by Paul Horwitz
United States an anti-commandeering principle with respect to some otherwise valid Commerce Clause laws that infringe on particular aspects of state sovereignty relating to the political process and structure in those states, so, by virtue of the language referring to the people in the Tenth Amendment, it also prohibits mandates that "commandeer the people."   [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 8:05 pm by Sex Crimes
Reason Magazine has an interesting article supporting the Respondent in the upcoming United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 2:09 pm by Native American Rights Fund
Shingle Springs Band of Miwok Indians (Child Custody - Tribal Court Jurisdiction)United States of America vs. [read post]
12 Oct 2012, 4:59 am by Susan Brenner
The Guarantee Clause of Article 4 of the Constitution states that `The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government.’ [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
God and the Illegal Alien, United States Immigration Law and a Theology of Politics by Robert W. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 9:10 am by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
Yesterday, we filed a friend-of-the-court brief in the Supreme Court in a case called United States Agency for International Development v. [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 4:15 am by Stone Law, P.C.
The judgment in Case C172/18 AMS Neve Ltd, Barnett Waddingham Trustees, Mark Crabtree v Heritage Audio SL, Pedro Rodríguez Arribas addresses questions concerning jurisdiction, in particular in cases involving Internet sales. [read post]
20 May 2012, 2:05 pm by Randy Barnett
(Randy Barnett) If the Supreme Court invalidates the individual insurance mandate, it need not call into question any other law that has ever been passed in the history of the United States.   [read post]