Search for: "United States v. Barnett"
Results 121 - 140
of 577
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2019, 6:00 am
“The fact that this decision was apparently political, rather than legal, completely undermines its legitimacy as a precedent,” vented Randy Barnett, counsel for the Republican state officials who brought the case. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 9:53 am
See Barnett v. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 6:30 am
In his dissent in West Virginia State Bd. of Educ. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 6:30 am
Barnett and Evan D. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 8:10 am
Barnett, Queering the Welfare State: Paradigmatic Heteronormativity After Obergefell, 93 N.Y.U.L.R (2018). [read post]
17 Feb 2019, 4:06 pm
We had posts by Brian Cathcart and Steve Barnett. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 3:42 pm
Bd. of Educ. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 12:01 am
Barnett, “The People or the State? [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 6:43 am
Facts: This case (Barnett, Jr. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 12:01 am
Barnette (319 U.S. 624). [read post]
25 Dec 2018, 9:30 pm
More troubling still is the possibility of lulling the public into thinking the United States can adequately address climate change without federal action. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 5:15 pm
United States in the context of the past eight years of Obamacare litigation. [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 7:19 am
His complaint asserted there was “gender discrimination in a predominantly male occupation and a culture of fear and reprisal that is tolerated and exist[s] in most if not all modern Class I Railroads in the United States. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 7:12 pm
Barnette, 319 U.S. 624 (1943). [3].Id. at 633. [4].See Wallace v. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 7:12 pm
Barnette, 319 U.S. 624 (1943). [3].Id. at 633. [4].See Wallace v. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 8:42 am
” First, in the 1929 case United States v. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 6:00 am
So much, incidentally, for the Lincolnian theory that the United States had been a singular entity since 1774, let alone the Declaration of Independence in 1776--the four-score-and-seven-years prior to 1776. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 12:55 pm
Our role is very clear: We are to interpret the Constitution and laws of the United States and ensure that the political branches act within them. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 9:26 pm
Barnette and Youngstown Sheet & Tube Company v. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 8:23 am
I have been asked to make the case for the confirmation of the President's nomination of Judge Brett Kavanaugh to sit on the Supreme Court of the United States, without regard to the questions raised after the close of his Senate Judiciary Committee hearing. [read post]
