Search for: "United States v. Barnett" Results 161 - 180 of 577
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2012, 10:18 am by Randy Barnett
Article II of our Constitution reserves for the president the authority to appoint Supreme Court justices and all other officers of the United States with the advice and consent of the Senate. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 8:23 am by Kurt Lash
Privileges and immunities of citizens of the United States are not the same thing as privileges and immunities of citizens in the several states. [read post]
18 Nov 2007, 10:35 pm
Barrett Prettyman, Shawn Francis Peters, Gathie Barnett Edmonds, Marie Barnett Snodgrass & Bennett Boskey, Recollections of West Virginia State Board of Education V. [read post]
21 May 2014, 1:00 pm
Sebelius, the case in which the Supreme Court of the United States upheld President Obama’s landmark healthcare reform against a constitutional challenge. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 6:52 am
United States even where Congress is exercising its Commerce Clause powers. [read post]
3 Aug 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  In Federalist No. 2, John Jay, writing of course as Publius, asserted that the Constitution had to be ratified, or else the unity of the United States, such as it was, would be lost. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  A Challenge for Originalists as We Look Toward the Future I began by noting connections between the practice of constitutional theory in the United States and judicial practice in the Supreme Court. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 8:14 pm by Rick Hills
United States between the Articles of Confederation (under which states could be commandeered to raise troops for Congress) and the the U.S. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 8:50 am
United States, Nos. 06-1524 & 05-1525 (Fed. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 9:28 am by Randy Barnett
United States, Judge Kavanaugh will be more open to a Fourth Amendment that protects digital records and property. [read post]
17 May 2017, 9:35 pm by William Funk
That legislative intent was given effect by the Supreme Court in its seminal cases of United States v. [read post]