Search for: "United States v. Bart"
Results 1 - 20
of 113
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Aug 2011, 8:22 am
BART accommodates expressive activities that are constitutionally protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and the Liberty of Speech Clause of the California Constitution (expressive activity), and has made available certain areas of its property for expressive activity.Paid areas of BART stations are reserved for ticketed passengers who are boarding, exiting or waiting for BART cars and trains, or for authorized BART… [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 10:05 am
Near v. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 1:21 pm
The rule finalizes EPA's finding that the trading programs in the Transport Rule, also known as the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR), achieve greater reasonable progress towards the national goal of achieving natural visibility conditions in Class I areas than source-specific Best Available Retrofit Technology (BART) in those states covered by the Transport Rule [See WIMS 6/7/12]. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 3:45 pm
The case is Save Lafayette Trees v. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 7:42 pm
In United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 11:52 am
The Argentine Republic ICSID Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International LawKristina Daugirdas & Julian Davis Mortenson, Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International Law Recent Books on International LawDeborah Pearlstein, reviewing How Everything Became War and the Military Became Everything. by Rosa Brooks Adam S. [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 2:17 pm
I know of at least 3 cases, the most recent from today in United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 3:52 am
United States, a fraud prosecution stemming from the “Bridgegate” controversy in New Jersey, arguing that “[i]f the Court chooses to apply the logic of Department of Commerce v. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 9:32 am
Neither [United States v.] [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 10:21 am
Under Youngstown v. [read post]
16 Apr 2016, 12:50 pm
The case is United States ex rel. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 6:36 am
NO-FAULT - MANDAMUS RELIEF - CPLR ARTICLE 78 Matter of Okslen Acupuncture P.C. v. [read post]
13 Nov 2016, 2:20 pm
(Ninth indisposed).United States v. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 3:43 am
Also at this blog, Katie Bart and Kalvis Golde put the announcement in historical perspective. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 9:04 am
(“A123”) appeals from the final de- cision of the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts denying A123’s motion to reopen and dismissing its declaratory judgment action against Hydro- Quebec (“HQ”). [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 7:30 am
The Court’s judgment, in Case C-311/18, Data Protection Commissioner v Facebook Ireland and Maximillian Schrems (“Schrems II”), holds that the Privacy Shield does not take adequate account of U.S. laws authorizing public authorities to access data transferred from the EU to the United States. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 7:22 am
In its opinion, the court cited United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 7:29 am
The federal Clean Air Act requires the Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency (“Administrator” or “EPA”) to promulgate modern pollution control limits at the massive Navajo Generating Station (“NGS”) and Four Corners Power Plant (“Four Corners”), located on Navajo tribal lands in Arizona and New Mexico, to remedy unhealthful, scenery-impairing air pollution in protected national parks and wilderness areas… [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 7:37 am
Case citation: U.S. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 7:26 am
Cariou v. [read post]
