Search for: "United States v. Bartlett"
Results 61 - 80
of 211
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Aug 2016, 6:16 am
Bank, University of California, Los Angeles, on Thursday, August 18, 2016 Tags: Boards of Directors, Compensation guidelines, Compensation ratios, Corporate culture, Executive Compensation,Labor markets, Management, Taxation Political Contributions and Lobbying Proposals Posted by Yafit Cohn, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP, on Thursday, August 18, 2016 Tags: Accountability, Citizens United v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 10:18 am
United States, 15-8629, and Beckles v. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 6:39 am
United States 15-8544Issue: (1) Whether Johnson v. [read post]
2 May 2016, 9:02 pm
As Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote in United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 12:51 pm
Before a new drug may legally be distributed in the United States, both its contents and its labeling must be preapproved by the FDA. [read post]
13 Feb 2016, 4:46 pm
This is an appeal from an amended opinion and order of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, dismissing at the pleadings stage all federal claims against the defendants on qualified immunity grounds because the plaintiffs had not adequately alleged that their constitutional rights were violated, and declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the state-law claims. [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 4:30 am
United States, 2016 WL 403310 (7th Cir. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 8:08 am
Bartlett v. [read post]
31 Dec 2015, 5:12 am
Sanofi-Aventis United States LLP, 806 F.3d 71 (2d Cir. 2015). [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 5:24 am
Bartlett, 133 S. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 5:01 am
Public Service Commission, is a “a substantial interest to be achieved by restrictions on commercial speech,” 447 U.S. 557, 564 (1980), we’re certain that mining the government’s briefs in prior First Amendment litigation such as United States v. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 10:56 am
Forest Laboratories, a case from the Lexapro MDL, the court agreed with defendant’s argument that per Bartlett, the United States Supreme Court has held that design defect claims involving pharmaceutical products are preempted. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 11:16 am
United States, 447 F. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 11:51 am
The United States Supreme Court’s decision to hear Tyson Foods v. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 4:43 am
Here is the abstract: Recent research indicates that the current cost of generic medications in the United States is the highest in history. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 1:29 pm
Notwithstanding, that claim fails for the simple reason that the United States Supreme Court has held that design defect claims involving pharmaceutical products are preempted. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 5:56 am
On May 26, 2015, the Solicitor General’s office responded to the United States Supreme Court’s Oct. 14, 2014 invitation for the government’s views on the certioraripetition filed in Athena Cosmetics, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 4:30 am
Pa. 2012); Steele v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 11:45 am
Bartlett, 133 S. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 6:00 am
In Morrison, the Supreme Court limited investors’ ability to bring private 10b-5 securities fraud actions to cases where the securities at issue were purchased on a United States stock exchange or were otherwise purchased in the U.S. [read post]
