Search for: "United States v. Bartlett" Results 81 - 100 of 179
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Oct 2019, 1:01 pm by Kalvis Golde
Bartlett, and Virginia argued Virginia House of Delegates v. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 3:50 am by Edith Roberts
At the National Conference of State Legislators’ blog, Lisa Soronen looks at Allen v. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 10:46 am
During my travels around the State of Georgia as President of the State Bar of Georgia, I often tell folks that President Josiah Bartlett, President of the United States in the television series "The West Wing" often said "Decisions are made by those who show up." [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 3:32 pm by Joe Mullin
“They are the patent examiners....They are paid by the United States of America. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 6:22 am
Perhaps most notable are changes made to account for the Second Circuit’s 2018 decision (in United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 11:15 am by Adam Schlossman
The Permanent Mission of India to the United NationsDocket: 10-627Issue(s): 1) Whether, in determining whether Congress authorized the Secretary of State ("Secretary") to preempt traditional state taxing powers by designating certain exemptions from state and local property tax laws under The Foreign Missions Act, 22 U.S.C. §§ 4301 et seq. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 4:41 am by Rachel Sachs
Perry (the challenge to California’s Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 1:07 pm
United States (08-5721). [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 6:42 am by Dan Stein
Bartlett, and American Express v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 4:00 pm by Aurora Barnes
United States 17-7793 Issue: Whether 18 U.S.C. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 6:01 am by Joe Consumer
  In Wyeth v Levine, the Court pointed out that “Congress did not intend FDA oversight to be the exclusive means of ensuring drug safety and effectiveness’ and that state law serves as a ‘complementary form of drug regulation. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 3:51 am by Edith Roberts
United States, the court held 5-4 that pretrial imprisonment on a new criminal charge puts a term of federal supervised release on hold. [read post]