Search for: "United States v. Bartlett" Results 141 - 160 of 211
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jun 2017, 6:36 am by John Elwood
De Grandy and Bartlett v. [read post]
17 Mar 2021, 9:06 pm by Robert J. Miller
And, finally, in 1975, the Court stated in United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2016, 4:46 pm by Patricia Salkin
This is an appeal from an amended opinion and order of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, dismissing at the pleadings stage all federal claims against the defendants on qualified immunity grounds because the plaintiffs had not adequately alleged that their constitutional rights were violated, and declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the state-law claims. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 2:30 pm by Bexis
  And drug companies are deep pockets, so these cases provide one instance after another (Bartlett was another SJS/TENS case) of courts leaning over backwards to justify liability. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 5:01 am
Public Service Commission, is a “a substantial interest to be achieved by restrictions on commercial speech,” 447 U.S. 557, 564 (1980), we’re certain that mining the government’s briefs in prior First Amendment litigation such as United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 11:13 am by Roshonda Scipio
Knight.Rome : Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2010. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 4:46 pm
License Agreement and Asset Purchase Agreements Know-How Right of First Refusal Contract Interpretation Extrinsic Evidence of a Contemporaneous Oral Agreement Parol Evidence Rule Breach of Contract Equitable Estoppel DefenseIowa LawContract Drafting   Appeal from United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa – Central Wildhawk Investments, LLC (“Wildhawk”) initiated this breach of contract… [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 5:00 pm by John Elwood
United States without reaching the central question presented by the cert petition, which involved clarifying the rule of Marks v. [read post]
24 Dec 2014, 5:00 am
  In this case the United States Supreme Court held that a state attorney general action (really brought by contingent fee counsel proceeding in an AG’s name), ostensibly on behalf of all the citizens of a state, did not qualify as a “mass action” under the Class Action Fairness Act (“CAFA”) so as to allow removal to federal court. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
Nev. 2011) (FDA compliance “relevant and admissible” but not “a bar to recovery”); Bartlett v. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 1:29 pm
  Notwithstanding, that claim fails for the simple reason that the United States Supreme Court has held that design defect claims involving pharmaceutical products are preempted. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 1:06 pm by Rory Little
United States, and then, in two consolidated cases, Stitt and Sims v. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 9:32 am
Opinion below (11th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner's reply __________________ Docket: 07-689 Case name: Bartlett v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 1:42 pm by Amy Howe
United States: Whether to overrule the “separate sovereign” exception to the double jeopardy clause; Nieves v. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 1:38 am by Christa Culver
(2) Does Section 514 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act violate the First Amendment of the United States Constitution? [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 10:02 pm
Three of the Big Four recording companies are based outside of the United States. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
June. 13, 2013), holding essentially that, since those meanies on the United States Supreme Court aren’t letting plaintiffs sue generic manufacturers, we’ll change Alabama common law and let them sue someone else. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 5:56 am
On May 26, 2015, the Solicitor General’s office responded to the United States Supreme Court’s Oct. 14, 2014 invitation for the government’s views on the certioraripetition filed in Athena Cosmetics, Inc. v. [read post]