Search for: "United States v. Batchelder" Results 61 - 80 of 82
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jul 2007, 9:32 am
Defendant also argues that his 360-month sentence of incarceration is unreasonable in light of United States v. [read post]
5 Aug 2007, 5:35 am
For the reasons stated below, we REVERSE the district court's denial of the State's motion for clarification and REMAND with instructions that the district court grant the State's motion for clarification consistent with this opinion. 07a0294p.06 2007/08/03 Williams v. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
United States: [The First] Amendment rests on the assumption that the widest possible dissemination of information from diverse and antagonistic sources is essential to the welfare of the public, that a free press is a condition of a free society. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 8:16 am
This disclosure came the same day I sat in the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals in chilly Cincinnati, where a three-judge panel (Judges Alice Batchelder, Ronald Gilman and Julia Gibbons) heard oral arguments in the ACLU v. [read post]
23 Feb 2007, 9:20 am
Such an extension, however, would accord such upward departures even greater protection than they had under the mandatory Guidelines.In United States v. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 7:06 am by Joy Waltemath
” Even if it did, the appeals court explained, its “bare textual analysis of ERISA” alone did not mirror the contextual requirements found in United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 12:57 am
The court addressed the problem of so-called "deliberate two-step" strategies employed by law enforcement to obtain a self-implicating statement from a suspect before a Miranda warning, and then using that statement to obtain a confession post-Miranda in United States v. [read post]
14 Sep 2008, 8:10 pm
Martin argues that the district court erred in calculating his advisory United States Sentencing Guidelines ("USSG") range by (1) applying the two-level enhancement under USSG § 2G2.1(b)(5) because the child victims were in his care, custody, or super [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 5:05 am by Eugene Volokh
In PruneYard, for instance, the Court stressed that "no specific message is dictated by the State to be displayed on appellants' property. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 2:24 pm by Marty Lederman
  The women who work for such churches thus are virtually the only women in the United States who will not be afforded this new national benefit, which I described in further detail in this post. [read post]