Search for: "United States v. Beach Associates, Inc."
Results 1 - 20
of 247
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2009, 7:47 pm
The United States Supreme Court heard oral argument today in Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 17-421 Filed: December 27, 2018 ALICE KIMBLE, Plaintiff, v. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 5:46 am
See Heron at Destin West Beach & Bay Resort Condominium Ass’n, Inc., v. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 4:31 am
VENETIAN PARK CONDO III ASSN INC VENETIAN PARK CONDO IV ASSN INC VENETIAN PARK CONDO V ASSN INC WOODLAKE APTS. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 1:29 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 12:52 pm
Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in the biggest takings case of the year, Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 10:28 am
By Laura Manning-HudsonThe recent decision in the case of United States of America v. [read post]
15 Dec 2022, 11:08 am
Bird B Gone, Inc et al., was litigated in the United States District Court – Central District (Los Angeles), case Number 8:19-cv-00847-SK, with the Honorable Magistrate Judge Steve Kim presiding. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 6:58 am
In an earlier post on this blog, I considered the potential impact on the First Amendment of Thomas J’s originalist reasoning in the Second Amendment case of New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v Bruen, and found some distinctly chilly zephyrs. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 5:30 am
The City argued that:[1] the doctrine of collateral estoppel bars Plaintiffs from bringing this action, citing the decision in an improper practice charge filed by the Commanding Officers Association of Long Beach, New York, Inc. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 5:30 am
The City argued that:[1] the doctrine of collateral estoppel bars Plaintiffs from bringing this action, citing the decision in an improper practice charge filed by the Commanding Officers Association of Long Beach, New York, Inc. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 5:30 am
The City argued that:[1] the doctrine of collateral estoppel bars Plaintiffs from bringing this action, citing the decision in an improper practice charge filed by the Commanding Officers Association of Long Beach, New York, Inc. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Syllabus STUDENTS FOR FAIR ADMISSIONS, INC. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Syllabus STUDENTS FOR FAIR ADMISSIONS, INC. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 5:48 am
(“NAVL”) of Fort Wayne, Indiana filed suit in the Northern District of Indiana alleging that Defendant, North America Moving & Storage, Inc. of Miami Beach, Florida infringed its rights in United States Trademark Registration No. 917,431 for the mark “NORTHAMERICAN”. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 5:48 am
(“NAVL”) of Fort Wayne, Indiana filed suit in the Northern District of Indiana alleging that Defendant, North America Moving & Storage, Inc. of Miami Beach, Florida infringed its rights in United States Trademark Registration No. 917,431 for the mark “NORTHAMERICAN”. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 1:13 pm
June 15, 2009): Amicus brief of the United States Amicus brief of the American Planning Association Amicus brief of the National Association of Counties, National League of Cities, U.S. [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 1:33 am
MATTEL INC., a Delaware Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 5:08 am
In my research this week, I came across a recent case from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida that I thought I would share: Vision I Homeowners Ass'n, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 8:04 am
United States, No. 09-6338. [read post]
