Search for: "United States v. Bedford Associates" Results 1 - 20 of 23
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2019, 2:39 pm
While these ordinances often contain a “criminal component”, municipalities rarely enforce the criminal penalties, but deem them necessary to cause compliance.Notwithstanding the laudable intentions behind this type of point of sale ordinance, and the usual reluctance of municipalities to enforce the criminal penalties associated therewith, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio in Pund has followed the lead of the Southern District… [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 2:39 pm
While these ordinances often contain a “criminal component”, municipalities rarely enforce the criminal penalties, but deem them necessary to cause compliance.Notwithstanding the laudable intentions behind this type of point of sale ordinance, and the usual reluctance of municipalities to enforce the criminal penalties associated therewith, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio in Pund has followed the lead of the Southern District… [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 7:06 am by Mark S. Humphreys
In 1989, the Texas Supreme Court, in the case, United States Fire Insurance Company v. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 8:01 am by Richard A. Epstein
The current economic situation in the United States is recognized on all sides to be grim, and not getting better any time soon.  [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 9:10 pm by Adam Kielich
How Texas Courts will Approach the MCA Exemption after Allen v. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 6:49 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals holds that the police had the right to detain a driver and his passengers while they searched the car for contraband (finding nothing) even though there was no probable cause to detain these people.The case is United States v. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 6:34 am by Richard A. Epstein
From this caldron emerged the famous Footnote 4 in the 1938 case of United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2011, 6:49 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The United States District Court, Southern District of Texas, Houston Division, had a case recently dealing, in part, with this issue. [read post]
31 May 2007, 1:14 am
.'s Founder and Son for Securities, Bank Fraud Upheld United States, appellee v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 3:39 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Plaintiffs alleged that the Amended Zoning Resolution deprived them of their right to free expression protected by article I, § 8 of the New York State Constitution and the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. [read post]
11 Feb 2018, 4:57 pm by INFORRM
On 8 February 2018 Dingemans J heard an application in the case of Bokova v Associated Newspapers Ltd. [read post]
25 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm
While these ordinances often contain a “criminal component”, municipalities rarely enforce the criminal penalties, but deem them necessary to cause compliance.Notwithstanding the laudable intentions behind this type of point of sale ordinance, and the usual reluctance of municipalities to enforce the criminal penalties associated therewith, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio in Thompson V. [read post]
25 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm
While these ordinances often contain a “criminal component”, municipalities rarely enforce the criminal penalties, but deem them necessary to cause compliance.Notwithstanding the laudable intentions behind this type of point of sale ordinance, and the usual reluctance of municipalities to enforce the criminal penalties associated therewith, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio in Thompson V. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 1:25 am by INFORRM
The biggest legal story of this coming week will be the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union – the Article 50 “Brexit” judgment. [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
As already mentioned, on 24, 25 and 26 January 2017, the Supreme Court (Lords Neuberger, Mance, Sumption, Hughes and Hodge) heard the joined appeals in the cases of Flood v Times Newspapers, Miller v Associated Newspapers and Frost v MGN. [read post]