Search for: "United States v. Beebe"
Results 1 - 20
of 44
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2024, 7:03 am
Beebe Med. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:43 pm
Things can be source identifiers, without being commercial source identifiers (United We Stand): confusion but not dilution actionable Jack Daniel’s didn’t purport to decide the full scope of the “noncommercial” exclusion. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 4:54 pm
Mazer v. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 12:34 pm
Real USFL, LLC v. [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 3:34 pm
Attorney’s Fees in a Copyright Action« Win One for the Gipper » Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:20-CV-1157 Just as famous as some great upsets in sports history are the motivational speeches that inspired them. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 10:58 am
Similarly, Sulzer Mixpac AG v. [read post]
8 Apr 2021, 9:52 am
Google LLC v. [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 11:28 pm
Likewise, the United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office (UKIPO) held repeatedly that comparable strategies could constitute bad faith [e.g. here, here and here]. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 4:22 am
Brunetti.Here's what Thomas writes:Erik BrunettiFreedom of Expression Transcends Morality in US Trademark Registration by Thomas Key As the Court of Justice of the European Union is currently considering the role of freedom of expression in trademark law, the Supreme Court of the United States has made a sharp determination on the matter in Iancu v. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 3:04 am
Professors Barton Beebe and Jeanne C. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 3:01 am
Belmora says that one need not own a trademark in the United States to bring a Section 43(a) claim (Bayer owned the mark FLANAX in Mexico). [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 9:09 am
” At another point, however, citing United States v. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 9:16 am
Unite Here * Trademark Dilution Symposium Videos * Griper Selling Anti-Walmart Items Through CafePress Doesn’t Infringe or Dilute–Smith v. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 12:53 pm
Fox News v. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 3:41 pm
Inherent in this process is recognition that a lexical unit is functioning as a referent and not as a description. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 2:27 pm
This was an appeal from the United States District Court for theMiddle District of Florida in No. 3:11-cv-00819-TJC-JRK,Judge Timothy J. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 2:45 am
Moreover, many of the seminal cases in the area predate such important new contributions to Commerce Clause juris prudence as United States v. [read post]
12 May 2015, 10:49 am
State v. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 4:23 pm
Now it’s possible to look at when people stopped saying “the United States are” and said “the United States is” by copying the contents of an entire library: a nonexpressive use. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 8:11 am
Coca-Cola’s treatment in Canada v. [read post]
