Search for: "United States v. Beebe"
Results 21 - 40
of 44
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Sep 2014, 4:21 am
The court begins its discussion by stating that “Transformation almost always occurs when the new work ‘does something more than repackage or republish the original copyrighted work. [read post]
2 Mar 2014, 1:42 pm
The Supreme Court has expressed concerns how the facial challenge might be used to undermine the legislative process, and accordingly, the challenging party is held to a higher standard of proof: To succeed in a typical facial attack, [the respondent] would have to establish “that no set of circumstances exists under which [the statute] would be valid”, United States v. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 1:43 pm
– 5:05 P.M.SESSION V (with coffee break 3:30-3:50)NYS CLE Credit: 2.0, Areas of Professional PracticeCommentators on proposals presented, and Q&A PeriodJane Ginsburg, ModeratorMorton L. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 11:10 am
United States (Alvarez Machain II), 266 F.3d 1045 (9th Cir. 2001). [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 11:30 pm
Last summer, the Supreme Court put its money where its mouth was in terms of federalism doctrine in its landmark decision about the Affordable Care Act (ACA), in NFIB v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 3:49 pm
Beebe v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods to protect against their parallel importation into the United States. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
The Software and Information Industry Association, arguing that “the Copyright Act contains the flexibility to deal with unforeseen applications of section 602″, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods… [read post]
7 May 2012, 12:06 pm
Carpenter, Texas Wesleyan School of Law (United States) Christine Haight Farley, American University, Washington College of Law (United States) Are there any outer limits? [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 7:42 am
Pallin v. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm
But unlike Houlihan Smith v. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 9:36 pm
After Mr Justice Vos gave judgment in United Air Lines Inc v United Airways Limited and United Airways Bangladesh Limited (unreported, but noted here by the IPKat), the good judge refused permission to appeal on the basis that this was about the most irresistible application for summary judgment for trade mark infringement and passing off as you could hope to find, even taking into account the defendants' submissions in their skeleton… [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 12:25 pm
Individuals tend to fare worse (.65 v. .74 for use, .27 v. .37 for ITU). [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 6:29 pm
From there, we turned to the rise of the right of publicity in the United States, A Right is Born: Celebrity, Property and Postmodern Lawmaking, by Mark Bartholomew, who explored a fascinating tension regarding the growth of the right of publicity both before and after the 1980s. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 9:45 pm
Medicare Fraud: CLINIC OWNERS GET PRISON FOR STEALING MEDICARE FUNDS, United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 3:40 pm
Kelly v. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 11:48 am
United States (W.D. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 9:38 am
— United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 7:54 pm
On Tuesday, The Arc of the United States, which provides advocacy and services for the developmentally disabled, issued a statement asking Beebe to follow the Parole Board's recommendation. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 4:01 pm
"Earlier coverage of Harbison v. [read post]
