Search for: "United States v. Belt" Results 61 - 80 of 509
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Nov 2015, 4:56 pm by Ashley Deeks
 The UNSCR didn’t authorize the United States and its allies to “take all necessary measures,” nor did the United States ask for the Resolution to contain that language. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 8:01 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
  In short, any approval of campaign expenditures, if accompanied by sufficient process, will be unreviewable under state law. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 9:00 pm
   If bong water possession were going to be made a felony anywhere in the United States, one would have expected that more likely to happen in the deep South or the bible belt, and not in Garrison Keillor country. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 3:00 am
§ 552 (FOIA), is a federal law that allow for the full or partial disclosure of previously unreleased information and documents controlled by the United States government. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 7:24 am
Its purpose is to "monitor, investigate, and submit to congress an annual report on the national security implications of the bilateral trade and economic relationship between the United States and the People’s Republic of China, and to provide recommendations, where appropriate, to Congress for legislative and administrative action. [read post]
Case date: 07 April 2020 Case number: No. 19-2035 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 3:17 pm by Gene Quinn
Obscure Patents: KSR Does Not Mean MuchSo much has been made about the United States Supreme Court's decision in KSR v. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 2:14 am
  The remarks are entitled: “Peaches and Plums do not Speak, but they are so Attractive that a Path is Formed Below the trees” [桃李不言,下自成蹊]: China’s Belt and Road Initiative and the United Nations Guiding Principles for Business and Human Rights. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 1:28 pm
The defendant relied on Deck v Missouri (544 US 622, 626 [2005]), in which the United States Supreme Court held that the Due Process Clause prohibits a state from confining a defendant in "visible shackles" during a criminal trial, unless a "special need," based on facts specific to the case, is shown. [read post]
2 Oct 2016, 12:49 pm by Howard Friedman
Nichols & John Witte, Religious Law and Religious Courts as a Challenge to the State (National Report for United States of America), (Religious Law and Religious Courts as a Challenge to the State: Legal Pluralism from a Comparative Perspective, Ed. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 8:46 am by Kathryn Fenderson Scott
Supreme Court considered the matter in United States v. [read post]