Search for: "United States v. Bennett" Results 141 - 160 of 736
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Oct 2021, 7:07 am by Holly Brezee
Alston, the United States Supreme Court reviewed whether the National Collegiate Athletic Association’s (“NCAA”) long-standing rules restricting “education-related benefits” violate the Sherman Antitrust Act (see, NCAA v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 2:35 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Brook, R. v [2012] EWCA Crim 136 (14 February 2012) Hussain v R. [2012] EWCA Crim 188 (14 February 2012) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Burke v The College of Law & Anor [2012] EWCA Civ 87 (14 February 2012) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Towry EJ Ltd v Bennett & Ors [2012] EWHC 224 (QB) (14 February 2012) High Court (Chancery Division) The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v… [read post]
22 Jul 2023, 12:22 pm by John Floyd
  In July 2022, the American Bar Association weighed in on the internecine legal warfare between political activist attorneys and state bar associations this way:   “In June 2018, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled in Janus v. [read post]
30 May 2021, 4:06 am by SHG
But then there are cases like Williams-Yulee v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 4:42 pm by Joey Fishkin
In an amicus brief, the United States had resisted this argument, writing, "[p]roviding additional funds to petitioners’ opponents does not make petitioners’ own speech any less effective. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 8:06 pm by Keith Rizzardi
UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, No. 2:10-cv-106-FtM-SPC, 2010 WL 5140729 (M.D. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 10:53 am by Miriam Seifter
The question presented in United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 3:50 am by Susan Brenner
  Gaona–Gomez admitted he was a Mexican national and was in the United States “without the proper immigration documents. [read post]
12 Aug 2020, 5:01 am by Rachael Hanna
On July 20, the Ninth Circuit declined to rehear en banc Fazaga v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 6:00 am by Record on Appeal
  The panel consisted of United States District Court Judge J. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 7:50 pm
The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“Board”) at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”) found that the claims were anticipated by U.S. [read post]