Search for: "United States v. Bernard"
Results 61 - 80
of 471
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2018, 7:22 am
Bernard Port, Harbor & Terminal District v. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 7:22 am
Bernard Port, Harbor & Terminal District v. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 4:28 am
FlynnEarlier this year, United States District Court Judge Bernard Friedman held in abeyance the case challenging Michigan's ban on gay marriage until SCOTUS decided the United States v Windsor case in June. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 6:28 pm
United States, 214 F.3d 106, 109 (2d Cir. 2000) (quoting United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2007, 6:46 am
Bernard, 625 F.2d 854, 860-61 (9th Cir. 1980), intimating) that there is no search, with United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 2:57 pm
The case is Pachter v. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 4:51 am
As is often the case with 3-judge panels, one jurist stays poker-faced; this time, it was Bush appointee, Judge Jeffery Sutton.Since the SCOTUS decision in United States v Windsor, nearly every state's federal court system has cultivated a same-sex marriage case, usually challenging the constitutionality of a state law that bans or limits the rights of same-sex couples. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 1:21 pm
Bernard. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 4:17 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 1:32 pm
Bernard concluded, with a reasonable degree of toxicological certainty, that it was more likely than not that exposure to chemicals emanating from the landfill was the cause of the increased frequency of childhood ALL observed in the plaintiffs. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 6:10 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 9:36 am
And, these are the patents and applications that are most likely to be affected by the decision in Bilski v. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 1:43 pm
Kappos, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director, United States Trademark Office (PDF) Reply Brief for Petitioner Bernard L. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 6:44 am
Over forty years ago, it insists, the Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 7:09 pm
Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 (1969), decided by the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 9:30 pm
Cabranes of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in 2017-2018. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 3:55 am
Stitt and United States v. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 9:32 am
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALSFOR THE SECOND CIRCUITPETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANCPRELIMINARY STATEMENT Petitioner, Lawrence R. [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 9:36 am
Urgenda Foundation Niccolò Ridi, United States—Anti-dumping Measures Applying Differential Pricing Methodology to Softwood Lumber from Canada Piotr Uhma, Joined Cases C-585/18, C-624/18, C-625/18 Hannah Woolaver, R v. [read post]
15 May 2009, 9:03 pm
Commonwealth v. [read post]
