Search for: "United States v. Berrios" Results 1 - 18 of 18
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2016, 1:45 pm by Kirk Jenkins
The courts have suggested that a similar ordinance in Chicago was valid, and courts in other states have held that home rule units have the power to investigate corruption in public officials, the court noted. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 10:09 am by Brian Shiffrin
United States, 447 U.S. 649, 656–657, 100 S.Ct. 2395, 2401–2402, 65 L.Ed.2d 410; United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 10:46 pm
The United States Supreme Court, in Ohio v. [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 9:04 pm
This is the train of citations (Sidhom is not pertinent): Thomas (2002): The defendant, however, bears the ultimate burden of proving, by a preponderance of the credible evidence, that the evidence should not be used against him (see, People v Berrios, supra at 367; People v Baldwin, 25 NY2d 66, 70; People v Whitehurst, 25 NY2d 389, 391; Nardone v United States, 308 US 338, 341-342), and that the police lacked probable cause to arrest… [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Two Families Got Fed Up with Their States’ Politics. [read post]