Search for: "United States v. Blackman" Results 61 - 80 of 828
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Nov 2023, 3:46 am by SHG
” Part V will respond to recent academic arguments suggesting that the President is an “officer of the United States” for purposes of Section 3. [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 4:28 am by Mark Graber
  They made no distinction between an officer, which included the president, an officer of the United States, and an officer under the United States. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 4:00 am by Josh Blackman
11/17/1880: The United States and China sign treaty that protects Chinese laborers residing in the United States. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 5:30 am by Josh Blackman
United States, which declared unconstitutional provisions of the Brady Act. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 8:29 pm by Josh Blackman
On Tuesday, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 1:11 am by INFORRM
 On 1 and 2 November 2023, the UK Supreme court (Lords Reed, Sales, Hamblen, Burrows and Richards) heard the appeal in the case of Mueen-Uddin v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
26 Oct 2023, 2:31 pm by Josh Blackman
And the Chief posed a similar question for the United States as amicus curiae: You're confident that the mootness question is easy. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
A notice of Saul Cornell’s research in advance of the oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 9:05 pm by Gianna Hill
In a recent report, Viral V. [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 12:01 pm by NARF
United States (Partition Trust Land; Administrative Procedures Act) United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 6:30 am by ernst
” In 2021 we published an article concluding “that the President is not a Section 3 ‘officer of the United States. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 7:35 pm by Josh Blackman
Calabresi now agrees with Tillman that the President is not an "Officer of the United States. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 10:24 pm by Josh Blackman
Part V considers another threshold question: was Trump ever subject to Section 3? [read post]