Search for: "United States v. Blair" Results 121 - 140 of 206
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jan 2016, 4:16 pm by INFORRM
On 19 January 2016, the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in R (Miranda) v Secretary of State for the Home Department ([2016] EWCA Civ 6). [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 7:03 am
Among the cases on which review was denied Monday were these: ** The constitutionality of a state business profits tax that treats dividends paid to U.S. companies by foreign subsidiaries differently, based upon whether those foreign units do business within the state. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 5:32 am by Andrew Hamm
United States, in which the justices held 5-4 that the government ordinarily needs a warrant to access historical cell-site location information. [read post]
17 May 2015, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
United States Florida: a former superintendent has had his lawsuit against the accounting firm Mauldin & Jenkins dismissed. [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 1:05 pm by John K. Ross
Blair, a case that offers the court the rare opportunity to scrutinize the 21st Amendment. [read post]
31 Aug 2021, 9:37 am by Blair & Kim, PLLC
The answer clarifies that the school may respond to reported sexual misconduct that occurs outside the United States or outside the education program or activity. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 4:22 am by INFORRM
The “Daily Express” has published an apology to Cherie Blair (noted by Tabloid Watch). [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 9:14 am
In the most recent decision, the Arbitration Panel specifically found that: Claimants are recent immigrants to the United States and they had very limited investment experience. [read post]
27 May 2012, 5:42 pm by INFORRM
On the Constitution Unit Blog, Brian Walker assesses the dropped Contempt proceedings against former Northern Ireland secretary Peter Hain. [read post]
8 Nov 2015, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
United States The Panopticon blog reports on the argument in the US Supreme Court case of Spokeo Inc v Thomas Robins, a case which concerns the issue as to whether there should be compensation for “digital injury” where there is no financial loss. [read post]