Search for: "United States v. Block" Results 81 - 100 of 3,498
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Oct 2019, 1:26 pm by Julian Arato
As readers of this blog are aware, delegations from around a hundred States have been working multilaterally toward reforming ISDS in the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL), Working Group III (WGIII) over the last two years. [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 4:24 pm by INFORRM
Sites that failed to verify users’ ages could have been blocked, and could have been prevented from accessing payment services and other ancillary services, pursuant to sections 21 and 23 DEA. [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
 After losing before the New Jersey Supreme Court, Princeton appealed to the United States Supreme Court with an absurd argument that their institutional First Amendment rights were violated by requiring that it allow people like my client on campus. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 6:59 am by Steve Vladeck
The Supreme Court has decided exactly one case involving the privilege, and even that decision—in the Watergate tapes case, United States v. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 6:21 am by Eric Goldman
Part 2 proposes that Section 230(c)(1) would not “prevent any State or unit of local government from enforcing a law that restricts any provider of an interactive computer service from facilitating the lease or rental of real property. [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 9:00 am by Mary Mock
While there are so far no legal, supervised injection sites in the United States, they exist in countries like Canada, Australia and some European countries. [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 9:00 am by Mary Mock
While there are so far no legal, supervised injection sites in the United States, they exist in countries like Canada, Australia and some European countries. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 2:05 am by INFORRM
Since Google LLC is domiciled in the United States, Mr Lloyd required permission to serve out under CPR 6.36, relying on the gateway contained in CPR PD6B – 3.1(9) i.e., claims in tort where damage was sustained, or will be sustained, within the jurisdiction. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 9:30 am by Howard Knopf
This was set forth in the landmark 1984 decision of the United States Supreme Court in Universal v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 9:05 pm by Larissa Morgan
” In September, the parties in United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 11:12 am
Picasso case (United States District Court for the Northern District of California). [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 9:33 am by Jeffrey Mitchell
Congress has reportedly authorized $550 million in the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) ReConnect funding in 2019 (as compared to $600 million in 2018). [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 1:26 am by INFORRM
United States Talks of a federal privacy law continue in the United States, the New York Times reports. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 1:09 am by INFORRM
On 24 September 2019, whilst the country was focused on the United Kingdom Supreme Court as it ruled that the prorogation of the UK parliament was unlawful, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU or ECJ), handed down judgment in Google LLC, successor in law to Google Inc. v Commission nationale de l’informatique et des libertés (CNIL), C‑507/17, effectively a sequel to the landmark data protection ‘Google Spain’ decision… [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 12:12 pm
  The court refers to its prior affirmance of the FCC’s common carrier reclassification decision, United States Telecommunications Ass’n. v. [read post]