Search for: "United States v. Block" Results 101 - 120 of 3,710
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm by John Dean
The State of Texas, joined by 25 others states, filed a lawsuit to block this executive action, which affects between 4 and 5 million immigrants in the United States. [read post]
23 May 2018, 12:15 pm by Ruthann Robson
Trump, United States District Judge for the Southern District of New York, Naomi Reice Buchwald, found that the President's... [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 5:32 pm by Ruthann Robson
Loudon County Board of Supervisors, United States District Judge James Cacheris of the Eastern District of Virginia found that a... [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 8:42 am
Corrie family suit blocked by judges, Seattle Times, Sept. 18, 2007.The case is Corrie v. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 2:12 pm by Liz Hayes
Americans United, joined by the Southern Poverty Law Center, filed a friend-of-the-court brief in the case, State of Hawaiʻi v. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 9:45 am by Carolyn Wright
The question is currently before the United States Supreme Court in the case of Allen v. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 9:45 am by Carolyn Wright
The question is currently before the United States Supreme Court in the case of Allen v. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 9:20 am by Liz Hayes
Muslim Ban 3.0 “is the third order the President has signed this year banning more than one hundred million individuals from Muslim-majority nations from coming to the United States,” we wrote in yesterday’s brief. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 7:52 am by Liz Hayes
The lawsuit was filed on behalf of Iranian Alliances Across Borders (IAAB), a nonprofit that serves the Iranian diaspora community, and six individuals, all of whom are U.S. citizens or lawful permanent residents with Iranian relatives who will be blocked from coming to the United States when Muslim Ban 3.0 goes fully into effect on Oct. 18. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 10:47 am by Miller & Falkner
At the beginning of its new term this month, the United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments for the case Madigan v. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 1:47 pm by Jeremy Malcolm
A justification that the discussion paper gives for this proposal is that Australia's obligations under its Free Trade Agreements with the United States, Singapore and South Korea require it to provide a legal incentive to ISPs to cooperate with rights holders to prevent infringement on their systems and networks. [read post]