Search for: "United States v. Blue" Results 1 - 20 of 1,117
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2012, 6:35 am
Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Michigan Attorney General also previously filed an antitrust action on the same matter (United States of America v. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 10:48 am by John Floyd
United States impose upon all federal prosecutors an obligation to disclose exculpatory and impeachment information. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 9:46 am by Duets Guest Blogger
The United States of America is one of the easiest places to start a new venture. [read post]
18 Jan 2007, 3:00 am
United States, No. 05-6629 (6th Cir. 1/12/07), has denied a deduction for the $5 million pledged by the developer of the House of Blues Atlanta as indemnification for losses sustained by the restaurant during... [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 10:40 am
So the company thus hoses the United States (and, secondarily, the states) for those taxes, which pay for unemployment benefits, and instead the employer and the Tribe keep for themselves (and then split) those taxes.How much money can you make this way?   [read post]
9 Jan 2008, 4:24 am
 2007).The Editors think that Gershwin’s “Rhapsody in Blue” was probably playing in the minds of United Air Lines’ lawyers as they read the recent opinion of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, as it joined the formation of courts agreeing that the removing defendant has the burden of proof of jurisdiction under CAFA, including the burden to prove existence of the amount in controversy. … [read post]
By Kiran Jassal Law students across the United States are familiar with “The Bluebook: A Uniform System of Citation,” prepared by the Harvard Law Review Association. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 12:30 pm by Nicholas Simpson, Attorney
McDonald made its way to the United States Court of Appeals for Veteran’s Claims (CAVC) challenging the very literal line in the sand the VA has been drawing between Blue Water and Brown Water veterans. [read post]
29 May 2013, 9:15 am by Stephen D. Rosenberg
A decision last week out of the United States District Court for the District of Rhode Island, Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Rhode Island v. [read post]
3 Feb 2019, 12:00 pm by Berry Law Firm
Wilkie case was heard at the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit by a full panel of judges (en banc) and that means it has precedential effect (it can be used as law and binding on future issues). [read post]
3 Feb 2019, 12:00 pm by Berry Law Firm
Wilkie case was heard at the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit by a full panel of judges (en banc) and that means it has precedential effect (it can be used as law and binding on future issues). [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 9:00 am by Melissa Anderson
  Shortly after Haberman, the United States Supreme Court rejected the substantial contribution test in Pinter v. [read post]