Search for: "United States v. Borders"
Results 181 - 200
of 4,110
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 May 2009, 4:02 am
EEO/iNews from the United States Courts of AppealiNews Related to Equal Employment OpportunitySource: iNews © 2009 John D. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 9:00 pm
In United States v. [read post]
28 May 2024, 5:59 am
The case, United States v. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 10:40 am
The Supreme Court recognized last year in Riley v. [read post]
10 Aug 2013, 9:41 pm
(Orin Kerr) I’ve blogged a lot about the Ninth Circuit’s computer search decision in United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 8:59 am
Here is the abstract: In Schenck v. [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 6:33 am
The panel affirmed the lower district court’s judgment, “holding that budgetary transfers of funds for the construction of a wall on the southern border of the United States in California and New Mexico were not authorized under the Department of Defense Appropriations Act of 2019. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 9:09 am
He was arrested by Pakistani border guards in Afghanistan and then transferred to U.S. custody. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 5:02 am
Indeed, this admonition sheds light on the Supreme Court’s unsigned order from December in In Re United States. [read post]
21 May 2024, 7:07 am
United States (D. [read post]
8 Feb 2018, 6:09 pm
The case, United States v. [read post]
22 May 2024, 10:06 am
The Supreme Court recognized in Arizona v. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 3:54 pm
Additionally, we will be interested to see whether and how the revised policy addresses two key cases that have come down since 2009: the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit’s 2013 decision in U.S. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 11:48 am
The US Supreme Court issued a 5-4 decision in Hernandez v. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 12:56 pm
In Oneok, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 4:43 am
Orin Kerr at The Volokh Conspiracy follows up on his earlier post about this case, raising a series of interesting questions. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 8:19 am
The United States derives its core strength because we embrace these values and abide by the rule of law. [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 1:00 pm
” Here’s What That Means for Immigrants (Vox, updated 5 March 2018) [text]Related post:- Regional Focus: United States (16 Feb. 2018)Tagged Publications. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 11:56 am
There should be no less protection for individuals who have not been arrested or shown to have committed any crime, but who instead simply want to enter the United States. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 11:09 am
” The Hernandez family’s case implicates foreign relations, the court reasoned, because of the “legitimate and important interests” of both the United States and Mexico “that may be affected by the way in which this matter is handled. [read post]