Search for: "United States v. Bowen" Results 61 - 80 of 184
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Sep 2015, 12:38 pm by Elina Saxena, Cody M. Poplin
Remember Division 30, you know, the group of Syrian rebels trained by the United States as the ground force to defeat ISIS? [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:42 am
  As of the time of trial, the state of the art did not include a genetic marker for SJS/TEN. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 9:16 pm
The patent is United States Patent No. 6,992,218 (“the ’218 patent”), assigned to SCR Pharmatop. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 6:15 am by John Elwood
United States, 14-361, involves a bribery ring in Baltimore under which the owners of a car-repair shop paid police officers to refer to them business resulting from the car collisions to which they responded. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 9:19 am by Maureen Johnston
United States, or (b) “preventing further [government] disclosure,” United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 7:24 am by Amy Howe
Oral arguments in King v. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 7:15 pm by Maureen Johnston
United States, or (b) “preventing further [government] disclosure,” United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 11:49 am
 The fast-track procedure in this instance was operated by the busy bees at the United Kingdom's Intellectual Property Office, and the business in the fast track was none other than Formula One itself. [read post]
3 Aug 2014, 11:34 am by Law Lady
ROLISON, Appellee. 1st District.Dissolution of marriage -- Contempt -- Failure to pay alimony -- Amended written order finding former husband in contempt for failure to pay alimony was inconsistent with trial court's oral ruling denying motion for contempt -- Remand for trial court to make findings in accordance with procedure set forth in Bowen v. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 11:00 am by Guest Blogger
Specifically, the Court detaches RFRA from cases like United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 5:03 am
  This opinion then explains that in ruling on that motion, the magistrate judge examined the factors established by the Supreme Court of the United States in U.S.v. [read post]