Search for: "United States v. Braxton" Results 1 - 10 of 10
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 May 2022, 3:17 am by Lawrence Solum
When abstaining from the resolution of Sentencing Guidelines circuit splits, the Court has been misinterpreting Braxton v. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 4:26 am by Jon Hyman
When a judicial opinion starts out with a quote such as this, it’s usually not a good sign for the defendant, unless you happen to be the United Auto Workers, the defendant in Phillips v. [read post]
31 May 2011, 4:30 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
"See, Forte v Lutheran Augustana Extended Care and Rehabilitation, 2009 WL 4722325 [EDNY 2009] [party did not show diligence in attempting service thus warranting denial of motion to extend time to serve]; Braxton v McMillan, 76 AD3d 607 [2nd Dept. 2010][failure to show due diligence required denial of motion to extend time to serve]; accord, Krisilas v. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
– ‘Rioja’ GI survives (Class 46) Suriname Impersonator acquitted of attempting to deceive paying customers into thinking she is the true Toni Braxton (1709 Copyright Blog) Switzerland Some data on 3D trademarks in Switzerland (Class 46) Shapes that made it, and those that didn’t (Class 46) United Kingdom EWHC: Revocation proceedings not an abuse of process even if not commercially justified: TNS Group Holdings Ltd v Neilsen… [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 4:16 am
Brian Peterson posts on a fascinating West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals decision involving the use of social media between a juror and defendant and the issue of disclosure of such connections during voir dire.In State v. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
– ‘Rioja’ GI survives (Class 46)   Suriname Impersonator acquitted of attempting to deceive paying customers into thinking she is the true Toni Braxton (1709 Copyright Blog)   Switzerland Some data on 3D trademarks in Switzerland (Class 46) Shapes that made it, and those that didn’t (Class 46)   United Kingdom EWHC: Revocation proceedings not an abuse of process even if not commercially justified: TNS Group… [read post]