Search for: "United States v. Briggs" Results 21 - 40 of 157
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2021, 3:48 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The minority (Lord Stephens and Lord Briggs) would have dismissed Libya’s appeal on the first issue. [read post]
21 Mar 2021, 5:10 pm by INFORRM
United States U.S. far-right and white supremacist groups stepped up their distribution of racist or anti-Semitic fliers, posters banners and other forms of physical propaganda last year, according to a study. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 1:46 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Lord Briggs and Lord Hamblen gave the judgment, with which the other members of the Court agreed. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 11:00 am by Evan Lee
The Supreme Court on Thursday unanimously reinstated the rape convictions of three former servicemen in United States v. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 7:05 am by Howard Bashman
Alito, Jr. delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court, Justice Barrett not participating, in United States v. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 1:00 am by Jocelyn Hutton
First, the compatibility of United Kingdom corporate taxation with certain principles of EU law and the liabilities of the Revenue to a taxpayer who has overpaid tax on the basis of incompatible United Kingdom legislation. [read post]
23 Oct 2020, 9:59 am by DONALD SCARINCI
Below is a brief summary of the cases before the Court: United States v. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 10:00 am by Evan Lee
During Tuesday’s telephonic oral argument in United States v. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 5:00 am by James Romoser
And amid all of that activity, the court heard oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 4:00 am by James Romoser
Evan Lee previews United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 4:08 am by James Romoser
Briggs and City of Chicago v. [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 9:00 am by Kalvis Golde
., the justices will hear oral argument in United States v. [read post]
10 Oct 2020, 8:00 am by Evan Lee
When the Supreme Court entertains argument on Tuesday in United States v. [read post]