Search for: "United States v. Briggs" Results 41 - 60 of 137
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Dec 2020, 7:05 am by Howard Bashman
Alito, Jr. delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court, Justice Barrett not participating, in United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 10:56 am by OxFirst
Pierce, United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 11:48 am by Florian Mueller
Howard: "Being completely non-technical it relates to the same invention, but the fact that it relates to the same invention does not lead to the conclusion that the patent of that invention in the United Kingdom and the United States and Germany and China is valid. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 12:21 pm by John Elwood
(2)  Whether United States v. [read post]
2 May 2010, 11:47 am
He still drove his car, but would on arriving at a store forget what he was there to buy.Shortly after his wife died, his daughter Mary Boyken returned from the United States to look after him. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 6:01 am by David G. Badertscher
DISTRICT COURTWESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKEmployment Black 'Plant Manager' Loses Unlawful Discharge Claim But States Title VII Salary Bias Claim Briggs v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 10:12 am by John Elwood
(2)  Whether United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 7:34 am by ASAD KHAN
The Supreme Court Generally speaking, Lord Carnwath – with whom Lords Kerr, Wilson, Reed and Briggs concurred – held that Part 5A deliberately establishes an uncomplicated set of rules. [read post]
17 May 2011, 12:39 pm by John Elwood
(2)  Whether United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 1:31 am
Would this be an appropriate case for a defence of parody or, in the United States, fair use (and could the facts be forced to fit within the scope of "fair dealing" or any other defences under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988)? [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 6:21 am by Amanda Rice
Also at SCOTUSblog, Briggs Matheson discusses Monday’s decision in United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 12:40 pm by John Elwood
(2)  Whether United States v. [read post]