Search for: "United States v. Briggs" Results 141 - 160 of 162
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Feb 2010, 2:36 pm by Martin George
Accordingly, the proposals provide for an exclusive head of jurisdiction for court proceedings supporting arbitration in the civil courts of the Member States and the corresponding obligation of the courts in all other Member States to transfer parallel litigation to the courts of the Member State where the arbitration takes place. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 4:29 am by Alfred Brophy
Then in the center of the monument is a map of Africa and the United States, which shows some of the places where South Carolina's African Americans' ancestors came from. [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 12:09 am
The case arose out of class action litigation presently pending in the United States. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 12:25 pm
In Briggs v United States, it refers to the Feres Doctrine. [read post]
20 Nov 2008, 12:36 pm
While acknowledging that the plaintiff's mistake was understandable, that it caused no prejudice to ICH, and that the loss of insurance coverage was a a harsh result, the Court nonetheless reasoned: Briggs relies on Agoado Realty Corp. v United Intl. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 8:25 pm
Briggs, 64 M.J. 285, 287 (C.A.A.F. 2007)(citing United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 5:41 pm
” Citing a 1948 case — Briggs v. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 3:19 pm
  Unless, of course, everyone likely to mount such a challenge fears bringing the marriage question before the United States Supreme Court, which is where a federal constitutional challenge is likely to end up going. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 3:00 am
The United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Briggs Ave. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 5:09 pm
Briggs, 64 M.J. 285 (C.A.A.F. 2007); United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 12:12 pm
Dissenting Member Walsh stated: Sound policy considerations underlie the statute's requirement that the showing of interest supporting a deauthorization election must be collected after the employees are subject to a union-security clause. [read post]
29 Jan 2007, 11:44 am
I previously noted that the result in Briggs and Clay would have been different had they been tried today, due to the R.C.M. 912(f)(4) change designed to compel a different result in United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 12:48 am
United States, 17 F.3d 890, 901 (6th Cir. 1994); Albrecht v. [read post]