Search for: "United States v. Brown" Results 21 - 40 of 4,198
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2024, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
United States (1951), justified the restriction of unpopular political groups like communists during the Red Scare. [read post]
22 Oct 2024, 10:28 pm by Bill Marler
 E. coli O157:H7 is one of thousands of serotypes Escherichia coli.[1] The combination of letters and numbers in the name of the E. coli O157:H7 refers to the specific antigens (proteins which provoke an antibody response) found on the body and tail or flagellum[2]respectively and distinguish it from other types of E. coli.[3] Most serotypes of E. coli are harmless and live as normal flora in the intestines of healthy humans and… [read post]
21 Oct 2024, 11:19 am by Ted Hwang
Restrictions on Public Comment The Brown Act applies some restrictions to public comment. [read post]
17 Oct 2024, 12:51 pm by John Elwood
 The court’s three Democratic appointees would have turned down the request for a stay, with Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson arguing that “Purcell has no role to play here. [read post]
4 Oct 2024, 5:28 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Moreover, the complaint fails to allege fraud with any particularity (see CPLR 3016[b]; see Browne v Lyft, Inc., 219 AD3d 445, 447 [2d Dept 2023]; Shah v Mitra, 171 ADed 971, 976 [2d Dept 2019]). [read post]
2 Oct 2024, 9:52 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
Its continued use serves as nothing more than the United States' poor attempt to circumvent its inviolable humanitarian responsibilities. [read post]
30 Sep 2024, 6:55 pm by Stephen Halbrook
" Apparently, the only judicial decision on the meaning of "part or parts" in the FFA was United States v. [read post]
27 Sep 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
" The blog of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts tells the story of Mendez v. [read post]
Just over a month ago, employers throughout the United States breathed a sigh of relief after Judge Ada Brown in the Northern District of Texas issued a summary judgment ruling in the Ryan v. [read post]
24 Sep 2024, 9:26 am by The Petrie-Flom Center Staff
United States, the Court ruled that it improvidently granted cert and returned the EMTALA issue for lower courts to decide. [read post]
23 Sep 2024, 1:18 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
As Judge Stranch explains, prevailing parties under the EAJA are not entitled to fees if "the position of the United States was substantially justified. [read post]
23 Sep 2024, 9:18 am by DONALD SCARINCI
§2401(a), the default six-year statute of limitations applicable to suits against the United States. [read post]