Search for: "United States v. Brown Shoe Company"
Results 1 - 20
of 86
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2024, 9:01 pm
The FTC recently sued to block Tapestry’s proposed acquisition of Capri, alleging that the effect of the combination of the companies’ handbag brands may be to substantially lessen competition. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 6:00 am
United States, United States v. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 9:12 pm
In Brown Shoe v. [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
FTC Chair Lina Khan previewed this in June, stating that “The word ‘efficiency’ doesn’t appear anywhere in the antitrust statutes. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Brown argued that the Supreme Court’s decision in International Shoe v Washington, the proper test of jurisdiction is whether the corporation satisfies the minimum contact test. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 4:09 pm
United States, 397 U.S. 742, 748(1970) (observing that waivers of constitutional rights must be voluntary, knowing, and intelligent). [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 9:05 pm
See generally Brown Shoe Co. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 7:55 am
See, Kaplan v. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 7:55 am
See, Kaplan v. [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 3:38 am
Ketanji Brown Jackson becomes the first black woman to be confirmed to the United States Supreme Court by the US Senate in a 53-47 vote. [read post]
6 May 2022, 6:10 am
In 1977, in GTE Sylvania, the Courtheld that vertical customer and territorial restraints should be judged under the rule of reason.[17] In 1979, in BMI, it held that a blanket license issued by a clearinghouse of copyright owners that set a uniform price and prevented individual negotiation with licensees was a necessary precondition for the product and was thus subject to the rule of reason.[18] In 1984, in Jefferson Parish, the Court rejected automatic application of the per se rule to tying.[19]… [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 12:37 pm
See Brown Shoe v. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 11:06 am
In the 1950 case of Brown Shoe Co., Inc. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 1:30 pm
The plaintiff, a California company, obtained a default judgment against the defendants in its home state and thereafter filed an action in the Superior Court in Connecticut seeking to enforce the California judgment or, alternatively, to recover under the theories of breach of contract or quantum meruit. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 2:41 am
The United States already has laws against redlining, where financial companies engage in discriminatory practices such as preventing people of color from getting home loans. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 1:07 pm
Background: The Grudging Acceptance of Merger Efficiencies Not long ago, economically literate antitrust teachers in the United States enjoyed poking fun at such benighted 1960s Supreme Court decisions as Procter & Gamble (following in the wake of Brown Shoe andPhiladelphia National Bank). [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 3:50 am
She wrote about this week and explained how Justice Thomas’s use of the words (“cleaned up”) in parentheses in the brown bag v. [read post]
10 Oct 2020, 9:46 am
See generally Brown Shoe Co. v. [read post]
