Search for: "United States v. Brown Shoe Company"
Results 41 - 60
of 85
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2022, 6:10 am
In 1977, in GTE Sylvania, the Courtheld that vertical customer and territorial restraints should be judged under the rule of reason.[17] In 1979, in BMI, it held that a blanket license issued by a clearinghouse of copyright owners that set a uniform price and prevented individual negotiation with licensees was a necessary precondition for the product and was thus subject to the rule of reason.[18] In 1984, in Jefferson Parish, the Court rejected automatic application of the per se rule to tying.[19]… [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 12:37 pm
See Brown Shoe v. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 4:49 pm
This exercise also involves considering whether reportage would be in the “public interest” (see Browne v Associated Newspapers Ltd; and PJS v NGN Ltd). [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 9:12 pm
In Brown Shoe v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 3:12 pm
Grinnell Corp. (1966) and Brown Shoe Company Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 2:30 am
Judge Jed Rakoff of the United States District Court in Manhattan, a former member of the National Commission on Forensic Science, said the weakest pattern analysis fields rely more on examiner intuition than science. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 6:00 pm
: (Danny Weitzner - Open Internet Policy), United States: How many lines is de minimis? [read post]
25 May 2009, 5:20 pm
(The IP Factor) Israel Patent Office practice regarding legal expenses in oppositions (The IP Factor) New Zealand New Zealand launches second ACTA consultation (Michael Geist) United Kingdom EWHC request for summary judgment denied - OHIM-IPO class heading conflict case: Daimler v Sany (IPKat) United States US General Trade secret litigation on the rise against laid off employees (Silicon Valley IP Licensing Law Blog) Seeking and… [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 2:41 am
The United States already has laws against redlining, where financial companies engage in discriminatory practices such as preventing people of color from getting home loans. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 12:45 pm
Agents of the state asked my name. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 1:07 pm
Background: The Grudging Acceptance of Merger Efficiencies Not long ago, economically literate antitrust teachers in the United States enjoyed poking fun at such benighted 1960s Supreme Court decisions as Procter & Gamble (following in the wake of Brown Shoe andPhiladelphia National Bank). [read post]
26 Jul 2006, 12:25 pm
App. 558, 559-60 (1986); United Motor Freight Terminal Company Inc. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
: (Techdirt), A day in the life of an IP blog – WIPO magazine article about the blogging life of Jeremy Phillips: (Patent Baristas) Global - Trade Marks / Domain Names / Brands Droste effect packaging: (box vox), (Class 46), Against cyberproperty (and cybertrespass): (The Trademark Blog), Fabergé egg flip – Article on Fabergé brand and protection strategy: (Afro-IP), Domain name tasting proposal passed by ICANN’s… [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
FTC Chair Lina Khan previewed this in June, stating that “The word ‘efficiency’ doesn’t appear anywhere in the antitrust statutes. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 8:11 am
Coca-Cola’s treatment in Canada v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 9:05 pm
See generally Brown Shoe Co. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
’ paper by Graeme Clark SC (IP Down Under) Full Federal Court decision concerning brand reputation in context of ‘lookalike’ products and famous brands: Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) Federal Court holds that grace period applicable to a ‘parent patent’ is different to that of its divisional ‘child’: Mont Adventure Equipment v Phoenix Leisure Group (IP… [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 3:38 am
Ketanji Brown Jackson becomes the first black woman to be confirmed to the United States Supreme Court by the US Senate in a 53-47 vote. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:14 pm
In the case of Doherty v. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 1:07 pm
See, Kaplan v. [read post]
