Search for: "United States v. Bryan" Results 1 - 20 of 386
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Dec 2012, 2:57 pm by CrimProf BlogEditor
Bryan Kim-Butler has posted Fiction, Culture and Pedophilia: Fantasy and the First Amendment after United States v. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 11:27 am
Below, Bryan Henderson of Stanford Law School recaps Tuesday's oral arguments in United Student Aid Funds, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 11:44 am by Anna Christensen
Below, Stanford Law School’s Bryan Henderson recaps yesterday’s opinion in United Student Aid Funds v. [read post]
15 Oct 2007, 11:23 pm
State Department and Department of Justice have filed an amicus brief in the pending 6th Circuit appeal in O'Bryan v. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 12:37 pm by Robert Thomas (
" As Bryan writes, "it also underscores the ongoing need for the United States Supreme Court to finally address whether the heightened scrutiny of the Nollan, Dolan, and Koontz Fifth Amendment takings cases applies to legislatively imposed permit conditions. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 9:00 am by LTA-Editor
By subarcticmike of Flickr By Bryan Russell On April 5th, 2012, United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit published its long-awaited review of the granted summary judgment motion in favor of YouTube against Viacom. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 6:48 am by Liz Hayes
Americans United activist Bill Dusenberry of Oklahoma began advocating for Darrow to join Bryan following Dusenberry’s 2009 visit to Dayton. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 2:00 am by Keith Paul Bishop
  SB 1272 (Lieu) would submit the following question to the voters: “Shall the Congress of the United States propose, and the California Legislature ratify, an amendment or amendments to the United States Constitution to overturn Citizens United v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 6:14 am
United States Supreme Court Decision: May 17, 2010 In a 5-4 opinion by Justice Kennedy, the United States Supreme Court ruled that sentencing juveniles to life without the possibility of parole for non-homicide cases is impermissible under the Eighth Amendment’s cruel and unusual punishment clause. [read post]