Search for: "United States v. Bryan" Results 61 - 80 of 471
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jul 2022, 10:39 pm by Florian Mueller
Bottom line: no import ban (unless Philips successfully appeals the decision to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit).In the post I linked to further above I discussed a Federal Circuit hearing of a preliminary injunction appeal by Thales. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 4:15 am by Florian Mueller
Cheney of the United States International Trade Commission (USITC, or just ITC) gave notice that the investigation of Ericsson's complaint over Apple's alleged infringement of cellular standard-essential patents (SEPs)--with Ericsson seeking a limited exclusion order against certain Apple gadgets and Apple arguing that an import ban over SEPs gives rise to an "unclean hands" defense--has been reassigned to Administrative Law Judge Bryan F. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 6:53 am by Guest Author
United States should lead a court to find that the FTC lacks authority to issue competition rules. [read post]
3 May 2022, 4:18 am by Emma Snell
Andrew Jeong and Bryan Pietsch report for the Washington Post. [read post]
1 May 2022, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
On Friday 29 April 2022 there was a hearing in the case of Vardy v Rooney. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 12:37 pm by Bernard Bell
United States Citizenship & Immigration Services. 407 F.Supp.3d 311 (D.D.C. 2019); Knight First Amendment Institute v. [read post]
8 Apr 2022, 10:53 am by Kevin LaCroix
”  It called the use of the “generic” standard an “error” which it studiously traced back to the 2011 trial court opinion in United Westlabs, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2022, 12:07 pm by Andrew Hamm
Department of Homeland Security presents the justices with a statutory question that, as Bryan Adams states in his petition, could affect about 200,000 federal employees who serve as members of the military reserves and National Guard. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 9:38 am by Susan C. Morse
Both sides center their arguments on a test set forth in the 2015 case United States v. [read post]