Search for: "United States v. Buckman" Results 21 - 40 of 124
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jan 2013, 12:54 pm by Eric Alexander
Kent, 552 U.S. 440 (2007)—whether state statutory provisions that require a plaintiff to prove some version of fraud-on-the-FDA as a predicate to recovery on certain claims are preempted by Buckman Co. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 2:21 pm by Eric Alexander
Kent, 552 U.S. 440 (2007)—whether state statutory provisions that require a plaintiff to prove some version of fraud-on-the-FDA as a predicate to recovery on certain claims are preempted by Buckman Co. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 2:33 pm
§337(a), which explicitly provides that all enforcement of the FDCA "shall be by and in the name of the United States. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 2:07 pm by John J. Sullivan
Now, Buckman, even read narrowly, held that tort claims based on a manufacturer withholding information from or misleading the FDA are impliedly preempted because the FDCA grants the power to enforce its provisions to the United States, not private citizens.  [read post]
19 Jul 2007, 1:47 pm
In the particular context of submissions to federal agencies, this type of allegation is facially preempted by Buckman Co. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 8:45 am
            We’ve had the United States’ amicus brief opposing Medtronic’s petition for certiorari in Stengel for a few weeks now. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 11:22 pm
Such a state court proceeding would raise the same inter-branch-meddling concerns that animated Buckman. [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 10:33 pm
See Brief For United States As Amicus Curiae, Buckman Co. v. [read post]