Search for: "United States v. Buckman" Results 81 - 100 of 123
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Feb 2010, 10:34 am by Beck, et al.
Because those are federal statutes, they can’t be “preempted” the way state-law claims were in Buckman Co. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 5:00 am by Bexis
Wyeth-Ayerst Labs., 385 F.3d 961, 966 (6th Cir. 2004) (holding that a drug manufacturer is immune from suit unless “the FDA itself determines that a fraud has been committed on the agency during the regulatory-approval process”) citing Buckman Co. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 8:39 am by Bexis
  The court held otherwise, finding the claims to be “squarely within the parameters” of Buckman Co. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 10:46 am
Today the United States Supreme Court ruled in POM Wonderful v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:00 pm by John Ehrett
United States 14-1145Issue: Whether, under Holland v. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 1:01 pm by Bexis
  About the only good thing about Blockis its refusal to allow Parisian to testify directly that the defendant violated the FDCA, that being both an improper legal opinion and barred by Buckman Co. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2007, 7:09 am
It excludes evidence of comparative safety between drugs of the same class, fraud on the FDA (due to Buckman preemption), corporate ethics, and regulatory actions outside of the United States. [read post]