Search for: "United States v. Buckman" Results 101 - 120 of 123
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2008, 10:46 am
"[A]ll such proceedings for the enforcement, or to restrain violations, of this chapter shall be by and in the name of the United States. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
  Comment k could correspond to Led Zeppelin, and state of the art might be The Who.And it seems that, for each of these bands, there’s a song we really like that gets slighted (in our opinion) when it comes to air time on classic rock stations. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 11:10 pm by Christa Culver
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton, LLPDocket: 10-1339Issue(s): Whether under the implied preemption principles in Buckman Co. v. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 11:50 am
A southern state, right? [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 10:36 am by Bexis
Lohr, 518 U.S. 470, 491 (1996) (discussing “pre-emption of traditional common-law remedies” in the context of parallel claims); Buckman Co. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 4:30 am
§337(a), which provides that the United States is supposed to enforce violations of the FDCA. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 12:54 pm by Bexis
  There've been a raft of good decisions, although none from the United States Supreme Court, for all us practitioners on the right (in more ways than one) side of the “v. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 9:56 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
Medtronic, Inc., 552 U.S. 312 (2008) and “impliedly preempted” — “implied preemption” is a code-phrase conservative judicial activists use when they want to pretend Congress tried to stop state tort lawsuits even when it didn’t — under § 337a of the MDA as interpreted by Buckman v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 1:15 pm by Bexis
There were 21 state cases decided by 47 judges. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 1:01 pm by Ad Law Defense
Coca-Cola Co., 573 U.S. ___ (2014); Buckman Co. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 1:01 pm by Ad Law Defense
Coca-Cola Co., 573 U.S. ___ (2014); Buckman Co. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 1:00 am
- Counterfeit cash flooding the market: (Afro-IP), Debranded fakes for Liberia: an update: (Afro-IP), South African music industry blames pirates for falling sales of local artists: (Afro-IP), Plaintiff obtains interlocutory relief in patent case Sanitam Services Limited v Bins (Nairobi) Services Limited: (Afro-IP), South Africa – new patent judgments: Buckman Laboratories v Bromine Compounds; Northpark Trading 3 (Pty) Ltd v Ausplow (Pty)… [read post]