Search for: "United States v. Butler" Results 61 - 80 of 330
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Dec 2013, 4:47 am by Amy Howe
Briefly: In The Washington Post, Robert Barnes observes that although, “[a]s smart as they are, Supreme Court justices sometimes falter when they predict the consequences of their decisions,” Justice Antonin Scalia’s predictions on same-sex marriage – made in his dissent in United States v. [read post]
28 Sep 2013, 11:08 am by Schachtman
First, the district saw through the argument that the claimed benzene-APL LNT model was good science because the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) relies upon it. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 8:20 am by Max Mallory
  Hurley and the Associated Press also cover the Court’s grant in United States v. [read post]
22 June 2015 US Supreme Court voids Los Angeles ordinance requiring hotel operators to turn over guest records on demand In a 5-4 opinion rendered on June 22, 2015, the United States Supreme Court held that a Los Angeles municipal code provision violates the US Constitution’s Fourth Amendment prohibition on unreasonable search and seizures. [read post]
17 May 2012, 9:26 pm by FDABlog HPM
FDA should not interpret the statute in a way that would result in the imposition of large liabilities on the United States and should therefore apply the BPCIA prospectively only. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 7:52 am by Sean Wajert
Franklin No. 08AP-728, 2009-Ohio-1323; see also Butler v. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 10:17 am by Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse LLP
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit recently allowed a “patronage capital” lawsuit to continue in federal court after deciding federal loan conditions and requirements may preempt state laws.[1] One of the agencies within the United States Department of Agriculture is the Rural Utilities Service (RUS). [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 3:02 pm by Anna Christensen
Arguing on behalf of the state, Michigan Solicitor General Eric Restuccia began by emphasizing the Court’s decision in North Carolina v. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 3:15 pm by Kirk Jenkins
  The Court began by pointing out that the United States Supreme Court has already held that neither the Seventh nor the Sixth Amendment specifically protected a right to twelve jurors, as opposed to some other number. [read post]