Search for: "United States v. CIO"
Results 81 - 100
of 274
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Nov 2020, 4:00 am
(See Matter of City of Yonkers v Yonkers Fire Fighters, Local 628 IAFF, AFL-CIO, 176 AD3d at 1199). 6. [read post]
19 Nov 2020, 4:00 am
(See Matter of City of Yonkers v Yonkers Fire Fighters, Local 628 IAFF, AFL-CIO, 176 AD3d at 1199). 6. [read post]
24 May 2016, 3:42 am
In the meantime California lien claimants challenging SB 863 were thrown out of the Supreme Court of the United States with a no comment "writ denied," the final grasp for straw over.On Monday, the court denied the petition for certiorari in Angelotti Chiropractic v. [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
"The employee organization [Association] representing the School District's [District] teachers filed grievances on behalf of two of its members in the collective bargaining unit who were passed over for transfers to a particular school in the District in favor of unit members with less seniority. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 11:04 am
"Citizen's United v. [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
"The employee organization [Association] representing the School District's [District] teachers filed grievances on behalf of two of its members in the collective bargaining unit who were passed over for transfers to a particular school in the District in favor of unit members with less seniority. [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 12:56 pm
The OEWG “brought ICT-related discussions to the big floor of the United Nations” for the first time, encouraging diplomats from every state to dive into the issues of cyber conflict in detail. [read post]
20 Aug 2017, 7:20 am
" Communications Workers of America, AFL-CIO, District 2-13 v. [read post]
20 Aug 2017, 7:20 am
" Communications Workers of America, AFL-CIO, District 2-13 v. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 7:33 am
AFSCME and several state pension funds, including the nation's largest, the California Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS), sent letters to the SEC in mid-November urging Cox to let the AFSCME v. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 4:00 am
-Long Beach Unit, 8 NY3d 465, the court explained that "[a]s a general rule, public policy in this State favors arbitral resolution of public sector labor disputes. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 4:00 am
-Long Beach Unit, 8 NY3d 465, the court explained that "[a]s a general rule, public policy in this State favors arbitral resolution of public sector labor disputes. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 4:00 am
-Long Beach Unit, 8 NY3d 465, the court explained that "[a]s a general rule, public policy in this State favors arbitral resolution of public sector labor disputes. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 4:15 am
Assn., Local 830, AFSCME, Local 1000, AFL-CIO v County of Nassau, 154 Misc 2d 545, affd 203 AD2d 267. [read post]
14 May 2007, 1:00 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITCriminal PracticeFraud Conspiracy Action, Based on False Statements To Medicare Agents, Remanded for Resentencing United States, appellant v. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 4:18 pm
United States Department of Labor, et al., Case # 4:16-cv-00731-ALM, which was consolidated with Plano Chamber of Commerce, et al. v. [read post]
20 May 2011, 3:09 pm
’” Campbell v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
28 May 2013, 6:04 am
” The AFL-CIO and the United Food and Commercial Workers International Union recently filed an amicus brief [here] with the Supreme Court siding with the DOL and arguing that the Seventh Circuit’s decision should be reversed. [read post]
