Search for: "United States v. CIO"
Results 101 - 120
of 273
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2010, 6:09 pm
United States, limiting the scope of its 2005 ruling in United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 11:30 am
Murphy v. [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
Council 82, AFSCME, AFL-CIO v New York Pub. [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 4:00 am
Citing Matter of United Fedn. of Teachers, Local 2, AFT, AFL-CIO v Board of Educ. of City School Dist. of City of N.Y., 1 NY3d 72, the court said that "[T]he public policy exception to an arbitrator's power to resolve disputes is extremely narrow" and the Court of Appeals has promulgated "a two-prong test for determining whether an arbitration award violates public policy. [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
Council 82, AFSCME, AFL-CIO v New York Pub. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 4:00 am
(Local 1000, AFSCME, AFL-CIO, Town of Wallkill Police Dept. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 1:42 pm
United States Department of Labor, No. 4:16-cv-731 (E.D. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 4:55 am
Co. v. [read post]
19 May 2011, 1:30 pm
Workers Int’l Union, AFL-CIO, CLC v. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 2:20 pm
No. 17-1323 (MN).United States District Court, D. [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 6:02 am
Citing United Food & Comm'l Workers Union, Local 1119, AFL-CIO v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 7:39 am
United States Postal Service. [read post]
31 Oct 2006, 4:48 am
See United States v. [read post]
21 May 2010, 7:21 am
McDougal v. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 1:06 am
United States U.S. [read post]
23 Jul 2007, 1:30 am
United States U.S. [read post]
1 Sep 2018, 9:28 am
State, 12 S.W.3d 6, 30 (Tex. 1999); see Walker v. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 11:38 am
State CIO approval required. [read post]