Search for: "United States v. California" Results 21 - 40 of 13,745
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jan 2016, 8:18 am by Taylor Gillan
The California Supreme Court [official website] ruled [opinion, PDF] Monday that the state legislature does have the power to use advisory ballot measures. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 6:32 am
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CALIFORNIA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, AMERICAN FARM BUREAU FEDERATION, LOS ANGELES COUNTY BUSINESS FEDERATION, CENTRAL VALLEY BUSINESS FEDERATION, and WESTERN GROWERS ASSOCIATION, Plaintiffs, v. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 6:32 am
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CALIFORNIA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, AMERICAN FARM BUREAU FEDERATION, LOS ANGELES COUNTY BUSINESS FEDERATION, CENTRAL VALLEY BUSINESS FEDERATION, and WESTERN GROWERS ASSOCIATION, Plaintiffs, v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:38 am by constitutional lawblogger
Plata, the United States Supreme Court affirmed the order of a three-judge federal court requiring California prisons to remedy prison overcrowding to comply with the Eigth Amendment. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 10:26 am by The Complex Litigator
Today, the California Supreme Court issued an Opinion following its acceptance of questions about the construction of California law from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 11:35 am by John G. Papianou
  Although the California Supreme Court had held that waivers of class arbitration are unenforceable in Discover Bank, the United States Supreme Court rejected, and invalidated, that holding in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 11:35 am by John G. Papianou
  Although the California Supreme Court had held that waivers of class arbitration are unenforceable in Discover Bank, the United States Supreme Court rejected, and invalidated, that holding in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]