Search for: "United States v. California"
Results 121 - 140
of 13,770
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2012, 8:37 pm
In so doing, the Court agreed with Clair, not the State of California, as to the standard that should be applied. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 2:03 pm
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, Case No. 08-15780, appealed from United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 6:05 pm
Back in January, we warned about what happened today: the United States Supreme Court has okayed police pulling people over to search their vehicles based upon an anonymous tip in the case of Navarette v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 10:16 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit today announced its decision in United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 4:38 pm
United States. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 11:05 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 9:00 am
There are no mandatory data retention laws in the United States of America. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 11:01 am
On December 14, 2009, the United States Supreme Court granted review in the case of Quon v. [read post]
18 Aug 2013, 4:03 pm
Since Chimel - many other cases have broadened this holding including the case of United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 6:44 am
Cir. 2010), to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 9:28 am
State of New York and California v. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 1:40 pm
Appealed from the United States Court of Federal Claims. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 3:18 pm
In State v. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 11:37 am
District Court for the Eastern District of California issued its ruling in United States of America v. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 2:38 pm
The first of the two closely-watched same sex marriage cases to be argued before the United States this morning prompted much tweeting and predictions, as well as the promised early release of the audio by the Supreme Court itself. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 9:36 am
On July 8, 2020, the United States Supreme Court narrowed employment protections from state and federal anti-discrimination laws for religious schoolteachers. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 11:39 am
Given Pruneyard -- which, I get, was rendered in an era in which California courts were perhaps more strongly free speech oriented than today -- I think that the state court might well have been more solicitous of the state law constitutional claim than federal judges.Plaintiff can still take its shot in the United States Supreme Court, but I don't think that'll go anywhere. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 12:58 pm
In essence, the CBIA’s challenge was based on the “unconstitutional conditions” doctrine from the Supreme Court of the United States’ Nollan v California Coastal Commission and Dolan v. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 6:32 am
In January 2010, decades of legal precedent were overturned when the Supreme Court, in Citizens United v. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 6:32 am
In January 2010, decades of legal precedent were overturned when the Supreme Court, in Citizens United v. [read post]