Search for: "United States v. California Eastern Line, Inc" Results 1 - 20 of 58
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2010, 3:28 pm by Erin Miller
Opinion below (United States District Courts for the Eastern District and the Northern District of California) Jurisdictional statement (09-1232) Jurisdictional statement (09-1233) [Disclosure: Akin Gump is involved in No. 09-1232.] [read post]
9 Mar 2014, 7:52 am
Core Wireless, on the other hand, is a non-United States corporation with one employee that exists solely to license its patent portfolio. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 1:20 am by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court issued its unanimous decision in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 9:01 pm
As the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California aptly explained in United States of America v. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 3:01 pm
Sept. 9, 2015), the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania reached the same conclusion in the context of a non-pharmaceutical product. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 1:39 am by Mandelman
Our mission is to register every mortgage loan in the United States on the MERS® System. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 12:00 am
It originates from the rights of privacy afforded under the United States Constitution, but surprisingly, there is no federal right per se. [3]  [4] Rather, forty states recognize either a statutory or common law right of publicity, and fourteen extend its reach beyond a person’s death. [5] As a result, California’s right of publicity laws are different from New York, etc., which means that a lawsuit’s outcome is highly dependent on the… [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 11:04 am by Robert Reznick
  Discussion The FTC took no time heralding the settlement agreement, describing it as “preclud[ing] the largest generic drug company in the United States from entering into one of the most common forms of anticompetitive reverse payments in the future. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 3:55 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
SCHIAVELLI; 08-CV-931 (NGG)(JO);  UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK; 2010 U.S. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 10:47 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Exposition Metro Line Construction Authority); application of CEQA to council enactment of measures which qualify as initiatives on local ballots (Tuolumne Jobs & Small Business Alliance v. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 8:55 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Exposition Metro Line Construction Authority); application of CEQA to council enactment of measures which qualify as initiatives on local ballots (Tuolumne Jobs & Small Business Alliance v. [read post]